Image hosted by Photobucket.com To read the tribute to SFC Marcus Muralles, please click here Image hosted by Photobucket.com

Monday, January 31, 2005

Blah Blah Blah


Went to the doctor- I was right. It's a sinus infection. I'm going back to bed. Go visit the blogs in the sidebar. Quietly. Very quietly.

Saturday, January 29, 2005

Site Updates and Stuff


Well, I managed to pull myself up out of the fog long enough to tweak the template. You'll notice a few new items in the sidebar. I've added the attendees to the Texas Blogfest under the banner, and I added to the blogroll.
And Russ helped me with the code (after Spats mentioned the idea) so that my blockquotes are in these pretty little boxes. Yeah, I know... they're gonna turn me into a geek if I'm not careful.
Go check out some of the blogs I added to the blogroll!!!

Interior Palpebra Cartography


This morning, after far too little sleep, I had a breakfast meeting with the 3 other people who hold the same volunteer position as I do at church and the guy who is interviewing for a job on staff at the church. He would be our staff contact. The associate pastor wanted to make sure we could work with/for this guy. Makes sense to me.

After that, I met Hubby and had lunch with him and some of the guys he works with. Nice guys.

Ran through Wendy's and got bacon cheeseburgers for the boys. Took some allergy medicine and promptly fell asleep on the couch.

There are a lot of cool things about living in Central Texas, and a few very bad things. The very, VERY bad thing? Austin is the allergy capitol of the country, if not the world. The largest concentration of cedar trees in the world (yes, the whole wide world) is in and around Austin. And guess what I'm very allergic to. You guessed it- cedar. And guess what season it is right now... yup. Cedar. I really need to buy stock in Kleenex™.

I have a lot of stuff I need to get done. And I'll get around to it. But, right now, I think I need to assume crash position again. Posting might be light for a few days... just until I get a handle on this allergy thing.

Friday, January 28, 2005

Desperate Times and All That


What do you do if you're trapped in your car in an avalanche? Well, if you're Richard Kral, you get drunk and well... wizz your way to freedom.
A Slovak man trapped in his car under an avalanche freed himself by drinking 60 bottles of beer and urinating on the snow to melt it.... He had 60 half-litre bottles of beer in his car as he was going on holiday, and after cracking one open to think about the problem he realised he could urinate on the snow to melt it, local media reported.

Rescue teams found him drunk and staggering along a mountain path four days after his Audi car was buried in the Slovak Tatra mountains.
I guess you gotta do what you gotta do. He's just lucky he didn't die of alcohol poisoning or got frostbite on certain body parts.



The Music Meme


Well, ZiPpo tagged me, so I guess I'm it. I can't help but think he might be a bit disappointed by this post. So, I guess I'll apologize in advance. You have been warned.

So, this post is supposed to be about my musical tastes. Hmmm... where to begin... Well, growing up, my dad was in a band, and they would practice in our basement. I would sneak downstairs, sit on the bottom step, and listen to my dad and his friends play. I know they played a lot of stuff (50s and early 60s foundation of Rock'n'Roll kind of music), but there are two things that really stick out in my memory. Credence Clearwater Revival and Wipeout (yeah, it's not the original by The Surfaris, but it was the only free playable I could find). Wipeout probably sticks out in my mind so much because my dad was the drummer. In my 4 year-old mind, that was my daddy's song. Everyone else was just there to back him up.

I can still tell you what my first two (non-little-kid) music recordings were. KISS's Destroyer and The Carpenters Greatest Hits, both on 8-track. My favorite group when I was in grade school was The Bay City Rollers (I had a crush on them before I really knew what a crush was. Owned every album they made. Watched their Saturday morning kids' show religiously.) When I hit junior high, my taste wandered over to Supertramp, Rush, Triumph, etc. Throw in a bit of Jethro Tull and Lynyrd Skynyrd, and you have my musical influences up to high school. (My dad had started listening to some country- Alabama and Ronnie Millsap, but I thought country music was for "old people".) I was in high school at the height (pun intended) of pop metal and the hair bands. Bon Jovi ruled the school, so it seemed. Mötley Crüe was what we listened to when we wanted to be rebellous. But, throughout high school, the cassettes that lived in my tape player were usually my Night Ranger tapes. The first concert I ever went to was Night Ranger's Midnight Madness tour, with The Georgia Sattelites opening for them at Six Flags over St. Louis. Then, my best friend and her boyfriend took me to their Seven Wishes concert for my sixteenth birthday. Ah, yes... I remember it well.

I went to college in Oklahoma, so you can blame that for my sudden change in musical taste. My freshman year, I was still listening to the metal bands (I found the best music to study physics to is Dokken... who knew?) but I also started listening to classical (Rachmaninoff is best for doing math homework, and Mozart is good for typing English papers.) Then I started dating this guy who listened to... *gasp*... country music. But he also had KISS's Destoyer cassette, so he couldn't be all bad, right? So, he slowly lured me to the dark side with "light country" like Restless Heart, then gently, so gently, introduced the "heavier" stuff until I was hooked on Travis Tritt and Garth Brooks, and I had turned my back on my first love, rock'n'roll. Towards the end of college, I had stretched even further, going through a Christian pop music phase, adding cassettes of Michael W. Smith and Audio Adrenaline to the mix.

Then about six years ago, we started going to the church we currently attend, and I started working with the associate pastor and music minister. As part of my "job", I had to listen to a lot of pop and rock music. So, now we can add Creed, Nickleback, Lincoln Park, Train, and Vertical Horizon to the mix.

So, have I come full circle?

OK... I say all of that because the first part of the meme isn't applicable to me. I know I should, but I don't have iTunes or any other music service on my computer. I'll get around to it- I promise.

That being said, here are the answers to the questions:
1. What is the total amount of music files on your computer?
Nine. Yup. I have nine music files on my computer. 7 of them were given to me by the same person. I feel so... uncool right now.
2. The last CD you bought is:
Rascal Flats Feels Like Today
3. What is the song you last listened to before this message?
Jo Dee Messina's "My Give a Damn's Busted"
4. 5 songs you often listen to or that mean a lot to you.
1. Wipeout (The Surfaris) 'Cause it's my dad's song!
2. Sister Christian (Night Ranger) That one song can bring back all the joys and sorrows of high school. It's the song that can "take me back."
3. I Hope You Dance (Lee Ann Womack) It's a wonder wish for everyone, not just your kids.
4.Everything I Do, I Do It For You (Bryan Adams) That was the first song Hubby and I danced to at our wedding reception.
5. Beth (KISS) Yeah, it's a lousy way to treat your wife, but when I was little, I just thought it was cool that there was a song with my name in it.
5. (I'm adding this one myself- out of curiousity) What's in your vehicle's cd player right now?
I have a 6 disk changer:
1. Toby Keith's Greatest Hits II
2. Rascal Flats Feels Like Today
3. WideAwake Live at The Lucky Lounge
4. Montgomery Gentry You Do Your Thing
5. Terri Clark Greatest Hits
6. Aerosmith Honkin' on Bobo
6. Who are passing the stick to (three people you're sending this to)?
1. Spats (my partner in crime for the blogfest)
2. Eric ('cause I can't wait to be amazed- I've heard some of the songs on his computer)
3. Joe R. (I'm just curious)



Not The Brightest Bulb in the Box


Someone must have forgotten to tell this guy that if you're going to phone in a bomb threat on the Super Bowl, you should probably not leave you name and cell phone number.
A man accused of leaving voice mail on the City Council president's phone saying "killing 100,000 people would get people's attention," was arrested Thursday, accused of making a bomb threat....

The message began, "Hi Elaine." A man who said his name was Albert Strickland left a cell phone number police traced to Jacksonville resident Albert Ray Strickland, 56. He was charged Thursday with threatening to discharge a destructive device -- a felony. No bomb was found in his Hyde Park home.

In the message, the man said Jacksonville didn't deserve the Super Bowl and said he wanted the mayor, city council and members of law enforcement to resign. He said police had tried to kill him several times. In the message, the man described himself as a scientist intent on stopping the Super Bowl, that he believed in the Big Bang theory and was "obsessed with the size it needs to be." The police report indicated that officers who interviewed Strickland said his voice matches that in the recorded message.

Strickland is being held at the Duval County jail and is scheduled for a first appearance Friday afternoon.
Being held in the Duval County jail? Do they have padded cells and backwards jackets? Just sayin'....

Of Dreams Lost...


Darth reminds us (well, points out that Michele reminds us) that today is the 19th anniversary of the Challenger accident. Was it really that long ago?

A little background. When I was little, I wanted to be an astronaut. I wanted to be a scientist and walk on Mars. OK, not just when I was little. My first major in college was astrophysics. (Then I met calculus, but that's another story.)

My love of space began in 3rd grade, when Miss Hall taught a science unit about outer space. I don't know what she said or what she did, but she did something right. My interest in space started then, and just grew over time.

When the STS first launched in 1981, we watched it on tv at school. I collected all the information on the shuttle that I could. I had The Space Shuttle Operator's Manual memorized. And, in the following 5 years, I never missed a launch or landing (I was mysteriously sick and unable to go to school those days. If my parents and teachers ever figured it out, they never mentioned it.) In the spring of 1985, I went to Space Camp Level II (now called Space Academy), where I was the first female commander of the year, and I received the "Outstanding Camper" award (which my friends quickly reminded me meant that I was the biggest "space case" there that week.)

So, that morning in 1986, I was as school. "Huh? I thought you said that you stayed home to watch the launches," I hear you ask. Why, yes, I did say that, didn't I? Well, you see, I had checked the weather forcast, and I knew (or thought I knew) that they wouldn't launch because it was too cold. So, I went to school. Walking through the halls, I heard someone crack a joke about NASA standing for "need another seven astronauts." The person who told the joke then saw me and immediately apologized. I asked them what they were talking about, and the response was "you don't know?" I went into my next class and asked my teacher what was going on. Mrs. Henry told me there was an accident, but she didn't know the details. I asked to be excused, and I called my mom.

I remember standing in the hall at the pay phone, crying, yelling at my mom that it had to be wrong, because they couldn't have launched. It was too cold. There had to be a mistake. There was no mistake.

I spent the rest of the day at school, but I didn't stay in any of my classes. As soon as the teachers would see me, they'd hand me a pass to the library. I spent the day in front of the tv. Shortly after I got home from school, the guy I was dating at the time (who lived in another town and went to a different high school) showed up at my house, not only to make sure that I was ok, but to try to talk me out of being an astronaut because it's "too damn dangerous."

As time went on, as more information was made public, I have to admit that I was angry. But not at the right person or group of people. I was angry at Christa McAuliffe, the teacher/astronaut that was on that flight. I blamed her, just because she was there. In my (immature) mind, if there had not been all of the publicity surrounding her, they would have been more willing to postpone the flight. They would have waited until the weather warmed up. The O ring wouldn't have failed. No one would have died. But it wasn't her fault. I know that now. But I still feel bad that I blamed her for so long. That wasn't fair.

Spring Break, 1988, my freshman year of college, I went back to Space Academy (I think they call it Advanced Academy now). While I was there, we watched an engineering video of the accident and the after-accident reports. Come to find out, I was right. Because of the temperature, the O Ring had become rigid and did not perform properly. It was a design flaw that the right people had not noticed until it was too late. It still strikes me as ironic that a 16 year old girl knew, but the people who could have pulled the plug didn't.

I wasn't the hot shot that time at the Academy - my dreams of going into space were already fading slowly into the background. I was trying to find my new dream. I won't lie to you and tell you that my dream of going into space has been totally lost. If given the chance, oh, yeah, I'd go. But I'm a bit older, hopefully a lot wiser.

Flying into space, conquering that (last?) frontier, is the dream of a lot of people. Unfortunately (or fortunately, depending on who you ask), those "space cases" who dream of weightlessness and walking on a dusty red planet are constrained by those whose feet are firmly planted on the Earth and who have to worry about money and politics and public relations.

Mean- spirited? UN-American? I guess That's Me!


Mexico has threatened to sue the state of Arizona in international court over Prop 200. They say it's mean-spirited and unAmerican. Hmm... wow... I guess I'm a big meanie, then.
Mexican officials have repeatedly complained about Proposition 200, which went into effect Tuesday. The statewide measure denies most taxpayer benefits to illegal aliens and requires state workers to report applicants for such benefits who may not be eligible. It also requires anyone registering to vote in the state to show proof of citizenship and bring a government-issued ID to the polling place.
Now, why in the world would Mexico be concerned about imigration law in another country? Oh, yeah... maybe it's because the illegal aliens that this would affect are funneling millions if not
billions of dollars into the Mexican economy. By denying benefits to people who are consciously breaking the law, they might just keep some of those criminals from coming here in the first place. Which would be a bad thing for Mexico. I mean, why should they work on jobs and their own economy when they can rely on the United States to pick up the slack for them?

In related news, Arkansas governor is a little confused about where Christian compassion ends and upholding the law begins.
The bill seeks to forbid public assistance and voting rights to illegal immigrants. Huckabee says it "enflames those who are racist and bigots and makes them think there's a real problem'' when there is not...

Huckabee, also a Republican and a Baptist minister, said Arkansans should welcome hardworking immigrants of all races. He singled out Holt, who often talks of his strong Christian beliefs. The governor said "I drink a different kind of Jesus juice. My faith says don't make false accusations against somebody. In the Bible, it's called don't bear false witness.''
Uh... how does saying that you need to need to be a legal citizen to vote equal making false accusations against someone? And what's Jesus juice?

Last time I checked, Jesus was all in favor of obeying the law (see Matt 22:21; 1 Tim 2; etc). So... shouldn't someone who claims to follow the teachings of Jesus also wish for the laws to be obeyed?

I'm all in favor of legal imigration. You sneak over the border, I want you booted out so fast your head spins. You do things the right way, following the rules, then I'll welcome you with open arms. If I have to obey the law, so does everyone else.

A Little Needy, aren't we?


This guy is just begging for attention. And, unfortunately, people are giving it to him.
St. Louis School Board member Bill Haas, who also is running for mayor, says in a Web log that loneliness, depression and financial problems have led him to consider suicide....

Haas writes that his online diary, called a blog, is "a little bit of a cry for help, and a lot just coming to peace with my passing, and sort of a last note." The blog entry - which covers two and half printed pages - provides extensive details about Haas' life, his bouts with depression and his money troubles. It says his "last day" may come sometime this spring or early summer after he euthanizes his three-legged cat and other pets.

The Web posting is extraordinary even for Haas, whose political career has been marked by the outrageous. He has moonlighted as a sex columnist while a member of the School Board, ran ads for a rich wife to help pay for his 1997 mayoral bid, applied for a reality TV show called "American Candidate," sought election to Congress, the state Legislature and the circuit attorney post, and continues to bombard the city's media daily with meandering e-mails.
I'm not really sure what to make of this guy. I mean... he's obviously an attention hog who craves the limelight and has an over-inflated sense of his own importance. On the other hand, he's a man who needs some serious psychological help. By his own admission, he has contemplated suicide in the past, and "since 1974, Haas wrote, he has twice checked himself into a hospital to 'catch my breath' and has been on and off prescription medication to treat depression."

So, is his blog one last desperate cry for help? Or one last "look at me!" moment? I just don't know....

Who Is the Greatest American?


AOL and the Discovery Channel are asking Americans to vote for their choice as the Greatest American. Who will it be? Go vote!

Oh, the Irony!


Imagine the irony if this ended up swerving and hitting us...
The week he died, science-fiction humorist Douglas Adams was honored with an asteroid named after one of the characters from his classic "Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy." Now, almost four years later, Adams has his own name in the heavens as well...

Asteroid Douglasadams was among the 71 newly named celestial objects announced Tuesday by the International Astronomical Union's Minor Planet Center in Cambridge, Mass...

When Adams died of a heart attack in 2001, at the age of 49, tributes came in from around the world — but one of the biggest tributes was actually announced just days before his death: the naming of an asteroid after Arthur Dent, the Earthling at the center of the "Hitchhiker" story.
This is what happens when geeks grow up...

What She Said


So, I'm driving around town, listening to the radio. The new Jo Dee Messina came on, and OMG, I have found my new theme song. Now, before you start telling me how "unChristian" it is... is it? Well... here... you decide for yourself... (her web site is currently playing the song when you load the page- your mileage may vary depending on when you check the link)

My Give a Damn's Busted (well, part of the lyrics, at least)
I really wanna care, I wanna feel somethin'
Let me dig a little deeper... Nope... Sorry... Nothin'

You can say you've got issues. You can say you're a victim.
It's all your parents fault, After all you didn't pick em
Well maybe Oprah's got time to listen. My give a damn's busted.

(*Well let me get this straight now) Your therapist said
It was all just a phase, A product of the prozac
And your co-dependent ways, So uhh ... who's your enabler these days
My give a damn's busted.

(*Oh you're tellin' me) It's a desperate situation,
No tellin' what you'll do. If I don't forgive you,
You say your life is through. Well honey... give me somethin' I can use.
(My give a damn's busted.) (*Ahh you knew I was gonna say that, didn't ya.)
Nope. Nothing unChristian in those lyrics. It's a condemnation of the victim mentality that has taken over our country. Blaming someone else for your problems is never a good thing.

Take for example the parents that are suing McDonalds because their kids got fat eating McDonalds several times a week. I have one question- did they order salads? If not, I'd be suing the school district for not teaching proper nutrition in health and PE. Or, maybe the parents should be arrested for child endangerment or abandonment for allowing their children to eat like that. And, no, ignorance of their dietary habits is no excuse. (I have identical twins who have a 20 lb weight difference between them. I know why. I watch what my kids eat, probably better than I watch my own diet.)

So, you have a situation beyond your control, then I'm all about compassion and caring. You get yourself in a jam and try to blame someone, anyone else... yeah, well... what Jo Dee said.




Thursday, January 27, 2005

Just a Heartbeat Away


I know I said that I wasn't posting anything else today, but... I had to.

Michelle Malkin shares with us the good news that Baby Jordan has received the heart transplant that he so desperately needed. And, while I am so happy for Jordan and his family, something that she wrote really set me off.
Miracles do happen. Great news.
Yeah, it is great news. For Jordan's family. But, for some other family, it's not. It's tragic. The most horrific moment of a parent's life. The nightmare that every parent fears. Someone's child died, and in that baby's death, Jordan has a new chance at life.

Somewhere, a family is grieving. All the plans they made, the dreams they had, are gone. They will be burying a child. There was no miracle for them, no great news. Only tears.

I am not against organ donation- far from it. My mother and one of my aunts have been recipients of donated organs (one from a family (live) donor, and one from a cadaver donor). We've been truly blessed by the advances in medical technology and the thoughtfulness of a family we'll never know.

I don't want to take away from Jordan's family's joy. Their prayers have been answered. Jordan has a long, difficult recovery ahead of him, but at least there is hope now. And, honestly, I am truly happy for them.

But,
remember that, sometimes, one person's time to dance is another's time to mourn. (Eccl 3:4). Please, don't forget the other family. Lift them up in your prayers. Thank God for them,that, even in their grief, they were willing to reach out and help another family. Pray that He will comfort them in this time of sadness.

And pray that Jordan's story will touch the hearts of other families, so that, if the unthinkable happens, that they will be willing to step up, and, in spite of their grief, be a blessing to another family.

Remembering the Wannsee Conference and the Liberation of Auschwitz


(In deference to the solemness of this topic, this will be the only post I do today. Please come back tomorrow for more random fun.)

This post was written by Joseph Norland of IsraPundit.)


This article is posted as part of the January 27, 2005, BlogBurst (see list of participants
), to remember the liberation of the Auschwitz death camp, sixty years ago, on January 27, 1945.On January 20th, we marked the anniversary of the 1942 Wannsee Conference. In the course of that Conference, the Nazi hierarchy formalized the plan to annihilate the Jewish people. Understanding the horrors of Auschwitz requires that one be aware of the premeditated mass-murder that was presented at Wannsee. Highlighting these events now has become particularly important, even as the press reports that '45% of Britons have never heard of Auschwitz' (Jerusalem Post, December 2, 2004)





The Holocaust, symbolized by Auschwitz, the worst of the death camps, occurred in the wake of consistent, systematic, unrelenting anti-Jewish propaganda campaigns. As a result, the elimination of the Jews from German society was accepted as axiomatic, leaving open only two questions: when and how.

As Germany expanded its domination and occupation of Austria, Czechoslovakia, France, the Low Countries, Yugoslavia, Poland, parts of the USSR, Greece, Romania, Hungary, Italy and others countries, the way was open for Hitler to realize his well-publicized plan of destroying the Jewish people.

After experimentation, the use of Zyklon B on unsuspecting victim was adopted by the Nazis as the means of choice, and Auschwitz was selected as the main factory of death (more accurately, one should refer to the “Auschwitz-Birkenau complex”). The green light for mass annihilation was given at the Wannsee Conference, January 20, 1942.

The Wannsee Conference formalized "the final solution" - the plan to transport Europe's Jews to eastern labour and death camps. Ever efficient and bureaucratic, the Nazi kept a record of the meeting, which were discovered in 1947 in the files of the German Foreign Office. The record represents a summary made by Adolf Eichmann at the time, even though they are sometime referred to as "minutes".

Several of the Conference participants survived the war to be convicted at Nuremberg. One notorious participant, Adolf Eichmann, was tried and convicted in Jerusalem, and executed in 1962 in Ramlah prison.

The mass gassings of Europe's took place in Auschwitz between 1942 and the end of 1944, when the Nazis retreated before the advancing Red Army. Jews were transported to Auschwitz from all over Nazi-occupied or Nazi-dominated Europe and most were slaughtered in Auschwitz upon arrival, sometimes as many as 12,000 in one day. Some victims were selected for slave labour or “medical” experimentation before they were murdered or allowed to die. All were subject to brutal treatment.





Children, victims of Nazi "medical" experiments

In all, between three and four million people, mostly Jews, but also Poles and Red Army POWs, were slaughtered in Auschwitz alone (though some authors put the number at 1.3 million). Other death camps were located at Sobibor, Chelmno, Belzec (Belzek), Majdanek and Treblinka. Adding the toll of these and other camps, as well as the mass executions and the starvation im the Ghettos, six million Jews, men, women, the elderly and children lost their lives as a consequence of the Nazi atrocities.

Auschwitz was liberated by the Red Army on 27 January 1945, sixty years ago, after most of the prisoners were forced into a Death March westwards. The Red Army found in Auschwitz about 7,600 survivors, but not all could be saved.

For a long time, the Allies were well aware of the mass murder, but deliberately refused to bomb the camp or the railways leading to it. Ironically, during the Polish uprising, the Allies had no hesitation in flying aid to Warsaw, sometimes flying right over Auschwitz.

There are troubling parallels between the systematic vilification of Jews before the Holocaust and the current vilification of the Jewish people and Israel. Suffice it to note the annual flood of anti-Israel resolutions at the UN; or the public opinion polls taken in Europe, which single out Israel as a danger to world peace; or the divestment campaigns being waged in the US against Israel; or the attempts to delegitimize Israel’s very existence. The complicity of the Allies in WW II is mirrored by the support the PLO has been receiving from Europe, China and Russia to this very day.

If remembering Auschwitz should teach us anything, it is that we must all support Israel and the Jewish people against the vilification and the complicity we are witnessing, knowing where it inevitably leads.


Wednesday, January 26, 2005

Lunch and a Movie


Today, Hubby and went out to lunch and to the movies. We ate at a new sushi place, Sushi Japon (on I-35 just north of 290, if you happen to live in Austin and want to check it out.) You can find a good review here.

When we got there, I was a little worried. There were only two other customers seated when we got there (what's up with that?) We sat at the sushi bar (to watch technique as much as anything else). The sushi chef was very nice, and it was fun to watch him work. Hubby got the sushi special (four pieces of nigiri, three pieces of California roll, and three pieces of their special "Crazy Roll"), and I got a selection of three hand rolls (spicy tuna, California, and salmon skin). Both meals came with miso soup. Then Hubby ordered a Tiger Roll (one of his favorites- smoked salmon, cream cheese and jalepeno (wrapped in nori and fried) then rolled in rice and wrapped in rice paper). I ordered a Volcano Roll (crab, avocado, and cucumber roll with spicy sauce and topped with baked scallops and tempura flakes and more spicy sauce). While we waited for our rolls (which, because of the frying and baking, took a little while to prepare), the sushi chef made a yummy, quick salad of cucumber, shrimp, crabstick, and spicy sauce, which he just made for us, just because. I thought that was a nice touch.

In the end, Hubby and I decided that we will definitely return, and probably bring the boys (yeah, my kids eat sushi. They think it's comfort food). We both really enjoyed our lunch. The spicy sauce is actually better than the sauce at Sushi Sake (one of the best places in Austin to get sushi, IMO). I think we each had one little complaint. Hubby would have liked to have spicy sauce on the Tiger Roll (I told him to ask for it next time). I thought the sushi rice could have used a little more rice wine vinegar. But, hey! If that's the only complaints we had, then that's pretty darn good. (Oh, yeah... one more complaint- we were too full to try the plum wine ice cream... oh, well... maybe next time.)

Then we went over to the Highland 10 Movie Theater to see Andrew Lloyd Webber's Phantom of the Opera. I hadn't been there since they remodeled (we used to have church there every Sunday back in the day, but I hadn't been back since.) Very nice! Stadium seating, comfy chairs. I was impressed (ok, some days I'm easy to impress... oh, well...)

A little background. Phantom is one of my favorite musicals/operas. Hubby and I have seen it several times. We watched the black and white French movie with subtitles; we saw a comedy play based on the story. Then Hubby gave me tickets to the Broadway production about 11 years ago, and then we saw it when it was performed at Bass Concert Hall in Austin. I have the Michael Crawford-as-the-Phantom soundtrack. I can almost sing every word of every song along with the cd.
Get the idea?

Well... I loved it. It wasn't perfect, but... it was close.Emmy Rossum was wonderful as Christine, and Patrick Wilson did a darn good job in the part of Raoul. Gerard Butler was a good Phantom, any any weakness in his singing was overcome when he was angry (he does a really good angry Phantom). Mini Driver was a riot as Carlotta, and the rest of the cast was good. Jennifer Ellison, who played Meg, was a stronger singer than most I've seen in that role.

From an artistic perspective, it was simply amazing. The cinematography left me in awe. I was drawn in when the chandelier was raised, and it just got better from there.

Like I said, it wasn't perfect. They changed some of the lyrics to spoken dialogue, and it improved the flow (some things just don't translate well from stage to film). There was one time, however, when they probably should have changed to spoken dialogue. If you don't know the story, I don't think I'm going to be giving any "spoilers" by saying that the final scene in the labrynth (when Raoul is there) should have been spoken. While it makes sense on stage, on the screen it just looked... silly.

But the rose was a nice touch, don't you think?

All in all, it was a great afternoon. Good food, good movie, good company. What more could a girl want?

This Would Almost Be Funny...


... if it wasn't for the fact that he wanted to kill people.
The young Saudi man told investigators this month that he wants revenge against the Iraqi terrorist network that sent him on the deadly mission that he survived.
Poor guy, right? He was just an innocent pawn, right? He didn't want to join the insurgents, fighting against coalition forces, right? Uh, no...
Shaya's video statement describes the journey of a young man ready to die in his zeal to drive Americans from Arab lands.

Shaya says he left Saudi Arabia for Syria in late October, right after the start of the holy month of Ramadan. A smuggler he knew as Abu Mohammed took him over the border into Iraq and into the hands of other Islamic extremists who call themselves mujahedin, or holy warriors.... Shaya moved to Baghdad in December to prepare for his final mission, which he expected to be as the suicide pilot of a bomb-laden car.

So, he wanted to martyr himself for the cause. Then what's the problem?
But on Dec. 24, he was given a preliminary job of driving a butane-gas delivery truck that was rigged with bombs. It wasn't supposed to be a suicide mission.

“They asked me to take the truck near a concrete block barrier before turning to the right and leaving it there,” he says. “There, somebody will pick up the truck from you,” they told him.

“But they blew me up in the truck,” he says.
I still don't see the problem. He wanted to be a suicide bomber. They made him a suicide bomber. Everything is as it should be, right? Well, no.
Shaya told the interrogators that he regretted his mission now.

“I want the Iraqi people to live in peace,” he says, and he can no longer support Osama bin Laden because “he is killing Muslims.”

As for the Zarqawi network that sent him on the mission that left him permanently disfigured and in prison, he says, “I want revenge for what they have done to me.”
I'm not buying it. I think he regrets that he lived and got caught. There may be some anger towards the terror organization, on religious grounds. (I'm by no means an expert, but don't they have to do certain rituals before they go "boom" in order to guarantee receipt of the 72 virgins raisins?) By tricking him into this, they were going to deny him his "just rewards." I can see him being a little bitter about that. More than that, I think he's mad because the suicide bomb coordinators obviously didn't trust him to get the job done. They felt like they had to press the button themselves.

That's gotta hurt the pride a bit.


Hitting close to my old home


Michelle Malkin linked to a St. Louis blogger today, and the subject matter hit a little close to home.

My dad's cousins live in East St. Louis, and a couple of years ago, they were surprised to find out that their father and mother had voted. Surprised because Uncle Vinnie and Aunt Elaine passed away a LONG time ago. Then again, they also found out that they had voted, as well. Funny- they didn't remember voting.

They were told not to worry about it. It was no big deal. Yeah, right. That was gonna happen. They pushed the issue, and there was an investigation. It got wrapped up into the bigger investigations in the area. (FYI, the byline in that last piece is my hometown- where I was born and raised.)

What's truly sad about the whole thing is that no one is surprised by any of this (well, except for Elaine and Vinnie voting- that was a surprise!) Everyone knew that there was corruption in East St. Louis. In the same way that everyone knows there's voter trouble in Chicago and St. Louis on a regular basis, and Wisconsin and Washington in this last election. But nothing happens, nothing changes, unless someone rocks the boat. Until someone says "Enough is Enough!"

And, yeah, I'm proud that members of my family got involved. That's just cool.

Tuesday, January 25, 2005

A Battle In The Mind


The Mom in me is having an argument with the Pundit in me, and it's getting ugly. Thought I'd let you have a ring-side seat for the brawl.

Let's start with the facts.
1. The First Amendment of the US Constitution states: Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

2. A woman was given a warning because of a... well... rude bumper sticker she had on her car. She claims it's a First Amendment issue.

3. The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) is an independent United States government agency, directly responsible to Congress. The FCC was established by the Communications Act of 1934 and is charged with regulating interstate and international communications by radio, television, wire, satellite and cable. The FCC's jurisdiction covers the 50 states, the District of Columbia, and U.S. possessions.

4. Lawmakers are asking the FCC to investigate a radio station for airing a tsunami relief song parody.
Those are the facts. Here are a few more details. First the woman and the bumper sticker:
Shasta Bates, 26, was standing in the shopping center store when a man walked in and started arguing with her about a bumper sticker on the back of her truck that had "F--- Bush" in white letters on a black background.

"He was saying it was very sick and wrong and you shouldn't be doing that," Bates said. "He was very offended by it. I said, 'You didn't have to take it so personally.' " McCrimmon, who had followed the officer into the store, said Karasek wrote down the woman's license-plate number and then told her: "You take those bumper stickers off or I will come and find you and I will arrest you." Colorado ACLU Legal Director Mark Silverstein said that the alleged threat of arrest clearly violates First Amendment protection.
Now the radio station stuff (I couldn't find the actual lyrics to the song, but, well, it was bad):
Several New York City Councilmembers gathered on the steps of City Hall to denounce the station which played a song that used racial slurs when referring to Asians and had lyrics about God laughing at those drowning in the waves.

Now City Council members want the Federal Communications Commission to take action. Queens Councilman James Gennaro said station management has to be responsible for their product.

The station's owner issued an apology after it pulled the song off the air. The station added that the seven-person staff has agreed to contribute one week's pay to the tsunami relief efforts.
Now, I'm sure you're sitting there, trying to figure out why "Mom" and "Pundit" are having trouble getting along. Maybe it's because "Pundit" thinks that the government needs to stay out of almost everything, and "Mom" wants to protect her babies.

I may surprise people on my opinions about the radio station (or not- some of you know me pretty well). "Pundit" wins hands down. ("Mom" would have a say in this if my kids listened to radio stations like the one that played this. But, they don't, and I know my kids. They would have maybe chuckled at first, but, in the end, it would have made them mad.) Everything that needs to be done, has been done. The radio station has apologized. The crew who recorded the song has made a donation to tsunami relief. And the market will do the rest. If people (not lawmakers, but The Public™) are truly upset with what happened, then they will contact the radio station, and the radio station will get rid of that lineup. That's the way it works. The FCC need not get involved (in the same way that they really didn't need to get involved with Janet's "wardrobe malfunction"- CBS lost enough revenue on its own without the FCC's fines.

Now, the bumper sticker. This is where the battle lines are drawn. "Pundit" says that this woman needs to be able to express her political opinions without regulation (but "Pundit" would also like to point out that the woman's choice of language takes away from the power of her opinion and shows her as simple minded, but we digress). "Mom" wants something done, NOW! Yes, this woman has the right to voice her dislike of the President (according to the article,"She said she put the sticker on her truck because she disagrees with Bush's stance on homosexuality and 'other issues.'" ) But this woman does NOT have the right to display profanity where my kids might see it. Does she? I mean, they can't go to R-rated movies (and, last time I checked, that particular word gets an auto-R) without an adult, and you can't say that word on tv (well, you're not SUPPOSED to be able to say that word on tv). So why should she be allowed to have that on her bumper?

Well... seems the Supreme Court had something to say about that:
"The Supreme Court considered a case about 30-some years ago where a person was prosecuted for wearing a jacket that said, 'F--- the draft,' on the back. The Supreme Court said states could not prohibit people from wearing such a jacket," he said. "They said, 'One man's profanity is another man's lyric.' "
"Mom" is real unhappy about this. So, the Supreme Court said, in a nutshell, that anything goes, as long as it's framed as political speech. There's no place for decorum, or decency, or common sense?

And, could it be said that this woman has violated some right of someone else with her bumper sticker? (ok, I'm not sure which one- any ideas?) I just can't imagine that it's ok to subject people who do not care about this woman's political view to this kind of language. (And, yes, I would be just as offended if it said "F--- Clinton" or "F--- Kerry". It's not who the message is about that's the problem- it's the way the message is delivered that is the problem.) If there is a rally, I can choose to listen, or I can choose to walk away. If there is a political commercial on tv, I can watch it, or I can turn the channel. I would argue that she's forcing her opinion on every person who drives behind her, and she's subjecting them to language that has been determined (by some governing bodies across the country, but not all) to be offensive and not in the public interest.

So, where does all this rambling lead to? Didn't I say that I want as little government involvement as possible? Well, last time I checked, the First Amendment says you can say what you want, but it doesn't say that anyone has to listen. I want government to intervene when my right to not hear what you have to say is violated.



Too Bad, So Sad


Michael Moore's wager that if he kept Farenheit 9/11 out of the Academy Awards' documentary category in hopes of getting the nod for Best Picture backfired on him this morning. The Oscar nominations were announced today, and, guess what? Mikey's little lie didn't even get nominated for Best Picture.

If I didn't know any better, I'd think the Academy was judging based on artistic merit. But they haven't done that in years.

Well, couldn't have happened to a nicer guy. Too bad, so sad, and all that.

Would You Like Some Cheese With That Whine?


Senate Democrats began their childish outbursts debate on Dr. Condi Rice's nomination as Secretary of State today. Here's a sample of their rants talking points:
"I don't like impugning anyone's integrity, but I really don't like being lied to," Dayton said in opposing Rice's nomination on the Senate floor. "Repeatedly, flagrantly, intentionally." Dayton accused Rice and other Bush administration officials of "lying to Congress, lying to our committees, lying to the American people."

"There was no reason to go to war in Iraq when we did, the way we did and for the false reasons we were given," said Sen. Edward M. Kennedy, D-Mass.

"But she is responsible for her own distortions and exaggerations of the intelligence which was provided to her," Levin said.

"Dr. Rice is responsible for some of the most overblown rhetoric that the administration used to scare the American people," Sen. Robert Byrd, D-W.Va., said.
Now, if Senator Byrd had ended his sentence with "heard in this Chamber" instead of "that the administration used to scare the American people," I would have had to agree with him. I mean, I have heard the Senate Democrats spew some of the most overblown rhetoric I've ever heard, all inspired by Dr. Rice. And the hits just keep coming!

Many people are starting to play the "what if" race card, and I'm not sure I can buy into it hook, line, and sinker. Granted, if Dr. Rice was a minority woman who happened to be a Democrat and the Republicans were calling her a liar, then sure, the Democratic party would be up in arms. But, the way things are right now, Dr. Rice could be a Caucasian male, and the Democrats would be doing the same thing. They just plain hate her. They know they can't stop her confirmation, so they'll have to settle for slinging as much mud at her as possible and besmirching her as much as possible.

As I was saying, want any cheese with that whine? I was thinking of some Chabichou du Poitou or some nice Beaufort. Something nice and... French...

Stuck in a Rut, Ted?


Ted Turner threw a temper tantrum compared Fox News's popularity to Hitler's election prior to World War II.
While FOX may be the largest news network [and has overtaken Turner's CNN], it's not the best, Turner said.

He followed up by pointing out that Adolph Hitler got the most votes when he was elected to run Germany prior to WWII. He said the network is the propaganda tool for the Bush Administration.

"There's nothing wrong with that. It's certainly legal. But it does pose problems for our democracy. Particularly when the news is dumbed down," leaving voters without critical information on politics and world events and overloaded with fluff," he said.
Here was FoxNews' response:
A FOXNEWS spokesperson responded: "Ted is understandably bitter having lost his ratings, his network and now his mind -- we wish him well."
This sounds like nothing more than sour grapes. It must be difficult for him. I mean, he had to sit there and watch his baby, the propoganda that is CNN, fall by the wayside once FoxNews began showing the world what "fair and balanced" really means.

But this also shows a scary fixation Ted has. Back in 1996, he had to apologize (although I'm not sure why the apology was given to the ADL and not to Mr. Murdoch) for comparing Rupert Murdoch to Adolf Hitler.

Man, you make enough money. Get your thorazine prescription refilled.



More Twin Fun To Look Forward To


From the "Thank Heavens they aren't that old yet" file, I see that I have this to look forward to in about 5 years:
Identical twin brothers have steered safely through their driving tests after making a small but identical mistake with the same examiner.

Adam and Scott Barker passed their tests with one minor mark after stalling at the same set of lights.
For some reason, that doesn't surprise me. Scares me, yes. Surprises me, no.

The Little Sneak


You know you're getting old when your children's technological knowledge surpasses yours.

T1 went up to type out his weekly writing assignment on Hubby's computer. That's when I hear, "Mom!!! Come Here!" Evidently, when he typed in his name as the top of the page, WORD automatically replaced it with "Dork". About the time T1 is telling me this, T2 was sneaking away, trying not to laugh.

Hubby comes home, and T1 told him what his brother had done. Hubby just looked at T2 and said, "Really? I don't even know how to do that."

*Sigh* I now know how my parents feel. And the boys are only eleven.

Living Fearlessly


Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia is the probable nominee for Chief Justice if/when Justice Renquist leaves the Court. Based on some of the things he said last weekend, he's not even trying to get the liberal vote. (And, no, I'm not saying that like it's a bad thing.)
The justice... told a largely Roman Catholic crowd of 350 at the Holiday Inn Select that there's nothing wrong with "traditional Christianity."

"God assumed from the beginning that the wise of the world would view Christians as fools ... and he has not been disappointed."
Is it wrong to "Amen!" a Supreme Court Justice? And I suppose a hearty "Preach on, Brother!" would be out of the question, as well.
"It is not irrational to accept the testimony of eyewitnesses who had nothing to gain. There is something wrong with rejecting a priori (deductively) the existence of miracles."
I know it may seem at first that I am making fun of this, or taking it all too lightly. On the contrary! To see a man with his power an authority, with his knowledge and intellect, making these kind of statements, I'm happy. I'm excited. I fear a little less for what our country is becoming.
"If I have brought any message today, it is this: Have the courage to have your wisdom regarded as stupidity. Be fools for Christ. And have the courage to suffer the contempt of the sophisticated world."
Those are tough words to heed. I mean, who wants to be called "stupid"? Who wants their ideas mocked? But he's just taking some of the things Jesus said to heart:
"Not only that--count yourselves blessed every time people put you down or throw you out or speak lies about you to discredit me. What it means is that the truth is too close for comfort and they are uncomfortable. You can be glad when that happens--give a cheer, even!-for though they don't like it, I do! And all heaven applauds. And know that you are in good company. My prophets and witnesses have always gotten into this kind of trouble." (Matt 5:11-12 The Message Bible)
But, in all honesty, the fact that Justice Scalia is willing to be a fool for Christ is not enough of a reason to want him as Chief Justice of the Supreme Court. I mean... I know a lot of people who are willing to boldly and fearlessly live their lives for Christ. They don't have the proper credentials to be a Justice, much less the Chief Justice. No, there is another reason I would love to have this man in charge of the highest court in the land:
He has described himself as an "originalist," following the Constitution as written by the Founding Fathers, rather than interpreting it to reflect the changing times.
That's why I like him. He doesn't look to international law (like Justice O'Connor) or view the Constitution as a "Living Document" (like a couple of the Justices). To Justice Scalia, the Constitution is what it is- the framework of our nation's government.

The fact that he is a devout and vocal Christian is just icing on the cake!



Where Did He Come From?


I am blessed with two really cool kids. Hubby and I will tell you that all the time. But sometimes they just prove it.

Yesterday, T2 stayed home from school with the yucks. Dr. Mom's preliminary diagnosis is wicked allergies (I'm allergic to Central Texas, so my nose is a good barometer of such things). This morning, he seemed not great, but ok. So, he scooted off to school with his brother.

About an hour ago, the phone rings. It's the school nurse- he's not quite as ok as we thought he was. Hubby went to get him. He had a snack, and now he's napping.

What does this have to do with his being a cool kid? Maybe "cool" isn't the right word. "Good", maybe? "Sweet," perhaps. "Caring," definitely. What did my sweet baby boy ask me when he got home? Not, "Mom, do we have any food?" but "How are you feeling this morning, Mom?"

Yup. We've got good kids.

Monday, January 24, 2005

Talk to Me!


Thanks to Jerry (a kind reader who actually reads the sidebar), I have added the ability for you, my 3 or 4 faithful readers, to IM me on Yahoo and AIM. The little icons on the right will tell you if I an online with either of those services. If you are signed on to those services, you can simply click on the icon in the sidebar, and it will open an IM window.

So, talk to me!

The Courage of Their Convictions


I was watching FoxNews this morning (surprise, surprise), and they were covering the March for Life Rally in Washington, DC. What stood out to me was the number of women who carried signs saying "I regret my abortion." The amount of courage... I was floored by what I saw.

You see, I know women who have had abortions, friends I grew up with. I have seen the pain, the grief, the shame that accompanies this "legal procedure." Very few people are privy to this small piece of their lives- it's not something they want people to know about. But, you see, I was there. I saw them hide it from their families, praying that they would never know what their "Baby Girl" had done. I witnessed the moment when one of them realized that it was more than just a tissue mass. I watched as they silently grieved, smiling on the outside, unwilling to let more people in on their dirty little secret. I know how hard it was for one of them to tell her future husband about her past. I felt her terror after she miscarried and feared that she may never carry a baby to term.

These women I know are not weak. Far from it. Their reasons for having abortions are varied (one "wasn't ready" and the other was told of possible medical problems with the baby and panicked). This happened years ago, and they've tried to put it all behind them, as best they can. There is a pain that will never go away- a scar that never quite heals. No matter how much they regret the decision they made, I don't think that either of them would have the courage to stand on a stage and confess that particular sin to the world. Not that they are Pro-Choice - far from it. They are both very Pro-Life. They just wouldn't go quite as far as the women I saw today on tv.

I believe that technology will eventually put abortion out of favor as time goes on. As babies survive and grow into happy healthy children with less and less time in the womb, people will be less likely to approve a procedure that destroys a life that can live in the real world. In the end, I believe that anything more than the "Day After" pills and possibly selective reduction will be frowned upon. At least, that is my hope.

Until that time, I am so grateful for women like the ones I saw on tv. Maybe, a young woman who is thinking about having an abortion will see one of these women expressing their regrets, and she just might think twice and ask more questions. That will have to be enough for now.

The Old Super Secret Spy Organization Trick


Yesterday, the Washington Post reported that the Pentagon has put together a new espionage unit to lessen its reliance on the CIA.
The previously undisclosed organization, called the Strategic Support Branch, arose from Rumsfeld's written order to end his "near total dependence on CIA" for what is known as human intelligence. Designed to operate without detection and under the defense secretary's direct control, the Strategic Support Branch deploys small teams of case officers, linguists, interrogators and technical specialists alongside newly empowered special operations forces.

...Pentagon officials said they established the Strategic Support Branch using "reprogrammed" funds, without explicit congressional authority or appropriation. Defense intelligence missions, they said, are subject to less stringent congressional oversight than comparable operations by the CIA.
An official in the Pentagon leaked this information to the WaPost, and the story was picked up by news services around the globe, along with the Pentagon's response.
Defense Department spokesman Lawrence DiRita, however, said there was "no unit that is directly reportable to the secretary of Defense for clandestine operations as is described in The Washington Post article." "Further, the department is not attempting to 'bend' statutes to fit desired activities, as is suggested in this article," he added in a statement.
Honestly, what was the Pentagon supposed to say? "Sorry about that, Chief. We kept missing it by that much. Would you believe there is no super secret spy unit?" "No." "How about half a unit?" "No." "How about 3 guys and a camel?"

Today on FoxNews, Rep. Loretta Sanchez (D- CA) was talking about the need for Congressional oversight and an investigation into this spy unit. When asked if there was any concern over who leaked the information, she said there was not. Huh?

Yes, I know there is a need for Congressional oversight. But I also know that there is a need for secrecy, and certain members of Congress have been known to flap their lips for political gain. And, in the world of espionage, lack of secrecy can mean death for our agents. So, she cares that this unit (which may or may not even exist) is out there not being micromanaged by Congress, but she doesn't care that, if this more-than-top-secret unit exists, someone within the Pentagon leaked it to the press. Someone with a high enough security clearance to know about an espionage unit that isn't supposed to exist. And that doesn't bother anyone besides me?

We need, especially in today's world, to have a group of men and women who fly far below the radar, who are not the most savory and upright of citizens, who can get down and dirty with the bad guys and get the job done. Do they need oversight? Yeah, I guess they do. Do they need their existence exposed on the front page of the Washington Post? No. I haven't decided which bothers me more- the leak itself or the fact that an irresponsible journalist put these people's lives in danger for the glory of the byline. Am I bothered by the supposed existence of this spy unit? No, it actually makes me feel pretty good.

I suppose, in a perfect world, all super secret spy stuff would fall under a select Congress committee (stuff like this makes me think that having a few career politicians around isn't such a bad idea, but then that feeling goes away.) This group of Congresscritters would go to the military (and the CIA, for that matter) and say "Don't tell me that we have a super secret group of spies." "We have a super secret group of spies." " I asked you not to tell me that."

But, no. This is the US Congress we're talking about. They're more along the lines of "Zis is Congress. Ve don't do super secret here!"

A Telling Tape


An audio tape, supposedly by our favorite bad guy, Al-Zarqawi, has pretty much laid on the line much of what we already suspected. Radical Islam, or even fundamentalist Islam, is not compatible with democracy.
The speaker attacked democracy as a springboard for "un-Islamic" practices, claiming that its emphasis on majority rule violates the principle that all laws must come from a divine source.
Now, I know that a Saudi cleric recently encouraged Muslims to reject terrorism.
One of Saudi Arabia's most influential clerics urged Muslims to eschew terrorism, saying attacks on the innocent were not in accordance with the teachings of Islam.

"Islam is a religion of moderation. Extremism has no place in Islam," Sheikh Abdurahman Al-Sudais of the Masjid'l Haram (Grand Mosque) said in a sermon delivered for Friday's Eid'l Adha (feast of sacrifice).
Let's see what happens now. These clerics are now stuck between a rock and a hard place. If they reject the ideas put forth on this tape, then they, by default, embrace democratic elections, which are not the policy in Muslim countries. If they embrace the ideology on the tape, then they are in essence embracing the radical and extremist ideologies of the terrorists.

This tape will not help the insurgents. If anything, it will encourage Iraqis to go to the polls. They are upset enough, having the country ripped apart by these insurgents. They know that if the terrorists hasn't poured over their borders, they would be well on their way to peace by now. Being told that the tyranny they lived under was more of Allah's will for them than free elections would be just a bit too much for them to swallow.

Let freedom ring.

Sunday, January 23, 2005

"Here's Johnny"


Thus was the announcement this morning at the Pearly Gates.

Johnny Carson passed away today due to complications from emphysema.

RIP, Mr. Carson.

The Rules


Today, I read Mad Mikey's post on The Rules™™. At the time, I thought to myself how nice it was that I didn't really need The Rules™™. I was wrong.

In the spirit of full disclosure, I am going to post The Rules™™ on the side bar. If you ever need a reminder, The Rules™™ will be there for you to refresh your memory.

Here is my version of The Rules™™. (Yeah, I mostly copied/pasted most of them from Mikey's post. Why mess with a good thing?) Learn 'em. Live 'em. Love 'em. Or you're gone.

1. My Blog, My Rules.

2. Dissent is tolerated. This means that you can disagree with me on what I post about. Try to keep it on topic, don't ramble for no apparent reason, and don't call people names when you get flustered.

3. Jerks are not. This means that if you copy/paste entire articles or personal manifestos, or come across like a bezerk pre-schooler in your comments, it'll be delete/edit/ban city for you.

4. Keep foul language to a minimum, if at all. Use common sense on this one - if anything, use lots of asterisks: * * * There are a couple of people who can use foul language on this site. If I haven't given you permission, you're not one of them.

5. I reserve the right to be a jerk and to cuss. And when I am, I'll admit it and/or warn you.
6. I reserve the right to ban jerks and spammers. Here in my house, I am the Queen and can act accordingly.

7. Spellcheck is your friend. I'm not a perfect typist, but I at least try. Good grammar and proper use is always appreciated.

8. I reserve the right to change/add/delete/ignore The Rules™™ as I see fit. See Rule #1.

9. When in doubt, see Rule #1.


There you go. Simple, really. Like I said, Learn 'em. Live 'em. Love 'em. Or you will be gone.

My blog. My rules.


Saturday, January 22, 2005

Co-opting Jesus for Political Gain


(I'm in a mood. This will probably be a long rant. You have been warned.)

On Thursday, some of the people protesting President Bush's inauguration are upset by what they call Bush's co-opting of Jesus for his own political gain.
"He's always talking about symbols of evil, using Jesus as a political pawn," said Rod Murphy from a group called, "10,000 Jesuses."

"The GOP and Bush sound like they have a mandate from Jesus, and I am sorry, but that is not the Jesus that I grew up with," Murphy told Cybercast News Service, noting his opposition to the war in Iraq.
Remember the name of Murphy's group. I'll get back to them in a minute.
"[Bush] talks all the time and his fundamentalist base about ... Jesus," said Ben Stern of Potomac, Md. "He makes his faith very public, yet at the same time he is doing things I consider -- and I am not even a Christian -- that Christian doctrine ... is in opposition to," said Stern, who carried a sign reading, "Who Would Jesus Bomb?"

Bush has not acted like a Christian, according to Stern, because of the "amoral way he is [defecating] on the little guy and, you know, racial minorities."
I'm sorry, Mr. Stern, but, if you're not a Believer and probably have not spent a lot of time studying Scripture, then how would you know how a Christian acts? In addition, it's pretty obvious that you know little about President Bush's policies if you feel he [defecates] on the "little guy" and racial minorities. President Bush has nominated more minorites to high level positions within his administration than any other President... ever.
..."He always says that he is talking to God, but what he should be doing is saying, 'I am wrong and I need forgiveness," Richter said, referring to Bush's policies in Iraq.
I bet he does confess his wrongs and ask for forgiveness from God. But I'll also bet that freeing millions of people from tyranny is not one of the things he thinks he did wrong.

So, I wanted to find out about these people who were protesting. Presuming that they are believers, I really wanted to give them the benefit of the doubt. Silly me! Here's the 10,000 Jesuses web site. Here are a few of their unbiased "Christian" concepts (with my $.02 thrown in):
We're still looking for a few good Jesuses ....

It's important to let Mr. Bush and the American media know that their talk of 'values' is misplaced. The idea is to take back the symbols of Christianity for those who actually practice it in spirit, if not in name. (So, are you Christians? Or do you just invoke the name of Jesus Christ when the mood strikes you?)

Jesus, the idea of Jesus and the man, has become a profound symbol for many Christians. (No, He's not a "symbol" to me- He is my Lord and Savior. No symbolism there.) ...Recently, in the last decade or two, we've witnessed a hijacking of Christian terminology and thought by institutions on the far right of the political spectrum. (No, recently, in the last decade or four, secularists have done everything in their power to REMOVE Christ from the mainstream community.)

... We don't believe, for example, that 'the Christ' would appreciate a church that supports the pre-emptive war on Iraq (not even to save millions of innocents from tyranny and potentially a forced religiosity that demeans and demoralizes its "believers"?), our use of napalm (renamed Mark 77 to avoid controversy) and cluster bombs. We don't think he'd like a church supporting an administration that ignores international conventions on torture (ignore? They didn't ignore it- there was an investigation ongoing before it was made public. The people who committed the torture are being prosecuted). Nor do we think he'd much like the rapacious culture the fundamentalists align themselves with when supporting Republican radical free market ideology (by the way, we also don't believe Jesus would shop at Wal-Mart, which has a history of using Haitian laborers who toil for 12 cents an hour).("radical" free market economy? So... in your world, Jesus is a communist? Too bad that's not Biblically backed up). We don't think he'd approve of churches that support an administration whose tax code disproportionately hurts the poorest in our nation, while helping the very richest. (Written by somone who obviously never read and has absolutely no understanding of the tax code in this country.)

On the other hand, we think that Jesus would accept gays and women who have had abortions and he'd be furious with the clerical hypocrites who would suggest otherwise. (The Church is open to all sinners - ie- all of us- all have fallen short of the Glory of God.) In fact, like the merchants of old, he'd probably cast those clerics from the temple. Just call it a wild hunch. (I agree with this, to a point. The Church needs to be open to all, but... no where in Scripture does it say that we are to be tolerant of sin. When one goes to Church, it is presumed that one goes in order to become closer to God and turn away from sin. A person active in the gay lifestyle is sinning. A woman who has had an abortion has not only sinned, but is also hurting. It is the moral obligation of believers to minister to her and help her heal as much as she can. Anyone who shuns her (presuming she's not planning on having more abortions) should be cast out.)

...One idea we've had is to march on the mall dressed as Jesus, 10,000 Jesuses to represent the dramatic differences within Christianity itself on what it means to be Christian. Perhaps, more realistically, we should have 10,000 prophets or 10,000 saints because many religious traditions bleed into Christianity, just as Christianity has influenced many other institutions, religious as well as secular. (So, you're saying that you're not really as interested in a personal relationship with Jesus, just a dramatic interpretation of your views of the Almighty. Hmmm... sounds a bit like what you're accusing President Bush of.)

A few enligtening examples:

* Jesus said, "Blessed are the poor," and "Render unto Caesar what is Caesar's." He did not say, "Ensure the wealthiest elite in our nation get the easiest tax load; especially when this cuts funding to educational and health programs that help the poor." (Jesus also said "render unto God what is God's" and that it was for the individual to help the widow and orphan, not government.)

* Jesus said, "Blessed are the peacemakers." He did not say, "Make your living building death machines at Northrup Grumman or Boeing or GE. Ensure your wealth even further by authorizing and condoning no bid contracts in the crassiest example of war profiteering in this century." (Jesus also said to protect the innocent and fight evil.)

* Jesus said, "Turn the other cheek." He did not say, "Drop 500 lbs bombs on the civilization centers of ancient Mesopatamia." Nor did Jesus say, "torture prisoners in a sexually humiliating manner to advance the cause of nation building. Or, shoot wounded soldiers in the head while they lie before you, supine and desperate." ( First, Jesus was talking about personal, one-on-one relationships, not nation against nation. God allows for just war. Read the Old Testament.)

* Jesus said, "Let he who is without sin caste the first stone." He did not say, "Condemn those who disagree with you as being Godless heathens who will be thrust into the bowels of hell for not accepting Jesus as their personal saviour." (Actually, Jesus said “I am the way and the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me.[John 14:6])

* Jesus said, "I pass judgement on no man," He did not say, "Judge all those whose religion you do not understand or whose sexuality you fear."(Jesus said "For as the Father has life in himself, so he has granted the Son to have life in himself. And he has given him authority to judge because he is the Son of Man. [John 5:26-27] As for "religion you do not understand", see John 14:6)

* Jesus said, "I give you a new commandment: love one and other." He did not say, "love only people who go to church." Nor did he say, "love only white, non-gay, Christian borne-again Americans with good grooming habits and no history of pre-marital sexual relations." He did not say, "Love only people who may know the verses of the Bible, but who have forgotten how to throw the merchants out of the temple and so support one of the most repressive and intolerant regimes in America's history." (Jesus did say to love one another. That is the fulfillment of all of the Commandments.)
You violate your own mission statements by your words and actions, Mr. Murphy. You condemn that which you do not understand. You provide no proof of any of your allegations, and you pass judgement without supporting evidence. You stereotype a group of people that you in no way understand.

I resent being told that, because of my beliefs, I am racist and homophobic, that I dismiss the needs of the poor in favor of the almighty dollar, that I am a hateful warmonger. You don't know me. You don't know President Bush.

Several years ago (during the Clinton administration) I began a system of prayer (I tend to need a lot of structure- long story for another day). One day a week, I was supposed to pray for "our leaders"- everyone from the Secretary General of the UN all the way down to our city's mayor and the city council. I had no problem, with one exception. I had this mental block when it came to President Clinton. It turned my stomach to even think about praying for God's blessings for that man. So, one day, I prayed about my problem with praying for him (yeah, I know. Weird. Just wait. It gets weirder.) Now, I'm not going to tell you that God literally speaks to me on a regular basis, but... that time, in my head, I heard Someone say "It's not your job to change him, just pray for him. You do your job, let Me do mine."

So, Mr. Murphy, if you really feel that President Bush (and other evangelicals) are misrepresenting Jesus, take your case to Him. Pray that the President will know God's Will. Not your will, God's Will. Don't commit the same sins you accuse him and the rest of us of committing.

"Just" pray, Mr. Murphy. Prayer, when done with a sincere heart seeking God's will, is so much more powerful than angry words or marches or protests. Prayer changes hearts, minds, lives.

UPDATE: Evidently, Mr. Murphy (or one of his friends) noticed that I had linked to their site, and has offered an insightful look at how they think Jesus would answer questions in an interview. You can read this "interview" in the comment section below. Honestly, I would have preferred if he had just left a link and not EATEN MY BANDWIDTH, but I wanted everyone to see exactly what he believes. His "humorous" look at Jesus turned my stomach. I find it neither humorous or an accurate account of Scripture. This person obviously hasn't studied the Bible and has conveniently chosen verses out of context that match up with his socialist/feel good/tolerance ideology. If any of you would like to fisk his "interview", feel free. I'm not inclined to give him and his little troop of blasphemers any more attention.

I know that when my time comes, I will have to answer for what I've said, what I have taught, and what I have done. So will everyone else. The only difference is that I know I'm flawed and in need of a Savior. I don't know if the 10,000 Jesuses feel the same way. And that is pretty sad.

Thanks, Dad!


I just saw a video of this on FoxNews. President Bush (41) came through for his son at the prayer service Friday morning.
President George W. Bush, who rarely carries a wallet, is caught empty-handed when the offering plate came around during a church service.

It happened during Friday's national prayer service in Washington.

Vice President Dick Cheney quickly offered some cash.

However, Bush refused and instead accepted help from his dad, former President George H.W. Bush.


OK, this is just too funny, and too cute. Growing up, my dad would always hand me some cash when it came time for the offering at church. And, honestly, every time he goes to church with us now, he tries to do the same thing. Doesn't matter that we can afford to give to the church on our own- it's a Dad thing.

I bet some of the LLLs will have a field day with this. And that's too bad. I think this is a sweet family moment. It shows that, no matter how old you are, and no matter how powerful you might be, parents are there for their kids. (Yeah, yeah... I know... mountains out of mole hills and all that... work with me here.)

And I just think it's cool that my dad and the former president have this in common. Makes me like President Bush (41) even more.

Thursday, January 20, 2005

The Word of the Day


I'm sure most of you remember four years ago when the MSM was all atwitter with a new word- "gravitas." Do you remember? Supposedly, President Bush lacked "gravitas"- a serious or dignified demeanor. He lacked a certain weightiness, according to the pundits. (In all honesty, I think the DNC just went through their thesaurus, looking for a "big" word that Average Joe wouldn't know, but would be too embarrassed to look it up, in order to insult President Bush without sounding bitter.)

Well... the MSM has pulled a new word out of their Insult Bag. This term's word is "hubris." Go ahead... look it up... I'll wait...

You're back? So, now you know that "hubris" means "overbearing pride or presumption; arrogance."

The pundits couldn't say "Dang, that W sure is an arrogant SOB." That would have been... gauche. So, they hide their petty insults in lofty words, hoping their maladroit and nescient postulations would somehow seem polished and enlightened.

Too bad it just makes them look pedomorphic and mordant. (See? I can use a thesaurus, too.)


Oh, my!!!


A baby weighing almost 17 pounds was born in Brazil on Tuesday.



You read correctly. Seventeen pounds. Needless to say (right?) he was born via C-section. Having carried eleven pounds of babies at one time, I can only think of one thing to say... "Day-ummm"

Getting on with the next four years


Well, the Inauguration is over. We can get on with the VRWC agenda now, right? Just checking...

Listening to the President giving his speech, a couple of things stood out to me:
  • "Some, I know, have questioned the global appeal of liberty," he said, "though this time in history, four decades defined by the swiftest advance of freedom ever seen, is an odd time for doubt." (amen! Preach on!)
  • "So it is the policy of the United States to seek and support the growth of democratic movements and institutions in every nation and culture, with the ultimate goal of ending tyranny in our world." (ending tyranny in our world- wow!)
  • "Our goal instead is to help others find their own voice, attain their own freedom, and make their own way," (which has already started)
  • "Our country has accepted obligations that are difficult to fulfill and would be dishonorable to abandon." (too bad many Liberals don't understand honor)
  • Renewed in our strength - tested, but not weary - we are ready for the greatest achievements in the history of freedom.
The greatest achievements in the history of freedom? Wow. OK... bring it on.

Critics will say that this speech lacked modesty and humility. Whatever. Now is not a time for modesty and humility. President Bush needed to put the world on notice, and he did - we're not backing down. Our way of life- freedom, honor, security, liberty- is the wave of the future. We are a young nation still, but we are the ones who got it right.

OK- time to do my Inaugural shopping...

Happy Anniversary!


Thirty-eight years ago this morning, my parents got married. Let's see... some of the highlights:
- Mom got sick at the rehearsal dinner (something about Grandma's tuna not sitting well... not sure of the details on that one)
- The wedding was in the morning, followed by a breakfast for the bridal party.
- If I remember correctly, Mom then took a nap.
- A regular reception occured that evening.

In the thirty-eight years that have followed, I think they'd agree it's been an adventure.

Happy Anniversary, Mom and Dad!!!

Wednesday, January 19, 2005

A Parent's Fear


When I was little, my dad wanted to move to Mexico. Not because he had this incredible fondness for enchiladas or is fluent in Spanish, but because he was afraid of this.
Another custody battle involving a child in line for adoption took a heart-tugging turn in Atlantic Beach in northern Florida Saturday. Three-and-a-half-year-old Evan Scott was taken from the only home and parents he's ever known and given to his birth mother.
That was my dad's biggest fear when I was a baby. He was even worried about putting my birth announcement in the paper out of fear that my birth parents would find out where I was and want me back. They didn't, but he had no way of knowing that.

I cannot imagine what Evan's birth mother went through, giving up her child like that. But to rip apart a family like this... on a technicality (the birth father, who was abusing the birth mother, never signed off on the adoption)... it's just wrong...

The Scotts are appealing the decision, but... because of some weird laws in effect at the time, there may or may not be much hope. Governor Bush has said there's nothing he can do, so it's up to the courts now...

Messin' With My Head


Last night, I slept with the tv on ( I do that about half the time). When I went to sleep, I had the tv on channel 46- FoxNews. When I woke up this morning, channel 46 was CNN Headline News. (yeah, I know- ew.) I finally found FoxNews (on channel 47).

From what I can tell, our cable company is doing a rebuild in our area. Our internet access and tv service has been a bit spotty (due to work on the lines, I guess). As part of the rebuild, they're moving all the channels around (to annoy me, I'm sure).

If they had added a bunch of channels, that would have been one thing. But, as far as I can tell (by checking out the TV Guide Channel lists) they didn't add anything- they just moved everything around.

This may seem like a rhetorical question, but I'd really like to know the answer. Why? Why move everything around? Why make your customers re-program everything (tv, TiVo, etc)? Why not leave the channels alone? It's not like you re-arranged them to make them more convenient- it's not in any logical order (as far as I can tell).

Well... it's all about me. They're trying to drive me nuts. Little do they know it's a short drive.


Texas State Senator Leticia Van de Putte, D-San Antonio, filed a bill this week that would require school districts to measure and report student's body mass index on their regular report card.
"We should be just as concerned with students' physical health and performance as we are with their academic performance," said Van de Putte.

When the measurement, which calculates body fat based on height and weight, indicates a student is overweight, the school would provide parents with information about links between increased body fat and health problems, Van de Putte said.
You see, evidently, we parents are so stupid we can't tell if our kids are overweight. We don't know that little Johnny might have a problem with the Twinkies if we're buying "huskies." We haven't quite figured out when "baby weight" becomes "a weight problem". Main Stream Media hasn't drummed into our heads the importance of eating a healthy diet. We need the school district and the all-knowing State to tell us that our kids need to drop the spare tire.

Yes, childhood obesity is becoming a problem. And children need to get off their collective rumps and play outside more- that would probably cut the problem in half. But parents know if they're children have problems with their weight- they don't need some well-meaning school nurse to tell them. If anyone should talk to parents about a child's weight, it should be the child's doctor, not the school district.

He Lost... AGAIN


Chief Justice Renquist stopped Michael Newdow's attempt to stop a prayer from being said at the Inauguration. He also rejected Newdow's request that he recuse himself. CJ Renquist gave this order without comment.

Mikey, it's over. Get over it.

How hard is it to understand this?


Today on FoxNews there was yet another liberal pundit who was bemoaning the $40 million that is being spent on the Inauguration. Once again, we were told about the poor soldiers in Iraq who aren't protected and how much better it would be if that money was spent reinforcing Humvees and giving our armed forces better equipment.

That $40 million isn't part of the federal budget. That money is privately donated. The President has no control over those funds. He can't give it to the military. It's not his to give. If it wasn't being spent on the Inauguration, it wouldn't be spent on anything in the federal budget. It's NOT THEIRS TO SPEND. (The money spent on security is already figured into the budget. It's not an additional cost.)

When adjusted for inflation, President Clinton's Inaugurations cost more than President Bush's Inauguration. Sure, we weren't at war. But that's not really the point, is it? It's not the government's money to begin with.

Oh, yeah. One more thing. Enough with the whole "FDR and chicken salad sandwiches" business. When FDR served chicken salad at his inauguration in 1945, yes, we were at war. But, more importantly, he was very ill. In fact, he passed away in April of 1945. He probably didn't feel like celebrating more than that.

Can you honestly tell me that the media would pay attention to the cost of the Inauguration if Senator Kerry had won? Didn't think so.

The Vote Is In


The Senate Foreign Relations Committee just voted 16-2 to recommend Dr. Rice as the new Secretary of State.

The two "nay" votes? Kerry and Boxer. Are we surprised? Uh... no.

Yesterday, Senator Kerry acted as if he was still on the campaign trail, and Senator Boxer did a very good impersonation of an uninformed spoiled brat. So much for his own party following Senator Biden's recommendation to just "get over it."

Now, Dr. Rice's nomination goes to the full Senate for confirmation, which she will get by an overwhelming margin.

And What Have We Here?


It's been a while since I've done a news round-up, so... here's the "Day Before The Inauguration" Edition of "Today's Headlines:

Dr. Condi Rice highlighted the "Outposts of Tyranny" yesterday during her Senate Confirmation hearing. The Big Six? Cuba, Burma (Myanmar), North Korea, Iran, Belarus, and Zimbabwe. Dang. Stinks to be them.

In related news, Dr. Rice heads back up to Capitol Hill for Day 2 of questioning by Democrats who haven't quite been able to "get over it." (It's on live right now on FoxNews- Dr. Rice really looks like she's about to go ballistic on Senator Boxer... I hope she does.)

President Bush is making the rounds this week, hitting all the big Inauguration parties, including the ones for the big donors who made the festivities possible. But the media says it like it's a bad thing. Whatever.

California performed its first execution since capitol punishment was reinstated in 1977. What took them so long? (Alan- thanks. This was the 11th execution, not the first, since capitol punishment was renistated. I had linked to a correct news article, but I got the "first execution" bit from a different - obviously wrong- article. my bad.- B)

A man in DC threatened to blow up his van if he didn't get his children back. He didn't really think they'd just hand over his kids. Did he?

In the "how much money did we waste on this?" file, a report states that seat belts and air bags save lives. In related news, the sky is blue and water is wet.

The Justice Department charged someone in the Iraq Oil-for-Food program, and he's already pleaded guilty. How's that UN investigation going again?

Secret Service agents are investigating a house with swasktikas and the words "Die Bush" painted on it. A friend of the owner painted over the phrase, saying the owner "decided it had all gone too far." Gee, ya think?

And, finally, researchers in England think that grammar lessons don't help students. I really don't get it. They don't think proper structure is important? What's up with that?

Where's my coffee? I need more coffee.

Tuesday, January 18, 2005

Tehran- Not Afraid of the US...


Evidently, Baghdad Bob has been giving lessons how to be a good Information Minister, if the latest blatherings of the Iranian Defense Minister is any indication.
"We can say we have developed a might that no country can attack us because they do not have accurate information about our military capabilities," said Shamkhani, whose comments were released Tuesday.

"We have produced equipment at a rapid pace with the minimum investment that has resulted in the greatest deterrent force," the ministry quoted Shamkhani as saying.
Hmmm... I seem to remember Mohammed Saeed al-Sahaf saying the same sort of thing- as Coalition forces were rolling into Baghdad.
Hersh wrote that he had repeatedly been told by intelligence and military officials, on condition of anonymity, that "the next strategic target was Iran."
He says that like it's a bad thing. The jury is still out as to whether Iran's nuclear program is purely for generating electricity or something more nefarious. Then there's this little gem-
The man who led Saddam Hussein's "Army of Muhammad" during 2004 has confessed that Iran is the primary source of funding for his jihadists battling U.S. forces in Iraq.
Add onto that the payback a lot of Americans think they're due because of the whole hostage fiasco, and we've got a few steamrollers (with names like 4th ID and 10th Mountain Division) with their name on it. Me thinks they need to cooperate a little more with the IAEA.

Oh, but wait. They're not afraid of anyone or anything. So... no worries, right?

You're presuming she knows what "integrity" is...


Secretary of State designate Condoleezza Rice sat through questioning during the Senate confirmation hearing today. She was questioned by members of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, and there were some good questions, and she handled herself admirably, as usual.

Things got a little heated when Senator Barbara Boxer (D- California) accused Doctor Rice of changing the focus of the War in Iraq. Dr. Rice fired back.
"We can have this discussion in any way that you would like, but I really hope that you will refrain from impugning my integrity," Rice told Boxer. "I really hope that you will not imply that I take the truth lightly."
Dr. Rice, there's only one problem with your hope. You're presuming that Senator Boxer knows what integrity is. Considering some of her recent actions, it's hard to tell if she'd know integrity if she was staring it in the face.

Oh, wait. It was, if she was looking at Dr. Rice. And she didn't know it. Go figure.



Saturday, January 15, 2005

Housekeeping


We're heading out for a brief spiritual retreat... (ok... who am I kidding... we're going out of town with R's family for a bit of fun... games will be played... plenty of food will be consumed... adult beverages will be downed... )

While I'm gone, check out some of the blogs in my blogroll... I'll be adding some more when I get back...

Cya!!

Happy Misha Day!


Today is the 38th anniversary of the birth of his Rottiness, Emperor Darth Misha I.

Happy Birthday, Misha!! And many, many more!!!

Friday, January 14, 2005

How's that workin' for ya?


I just saw this on FoxNews. You're gonna love it.

There's a video tape being aired in Iraq, in English, that encourages US military forces to lay down their arms.
A masked guerrilla from an unknown group called the Islamic Jihad Army, eschewing past impassioned Arabic-language threats of holy war, told US soldiers: "This is not your war, nor are you fighting for a true cause in Iraq."
"To the American soldiers we say you can also choose to fight tyranny with us. Lay down your weapons and seek refuge in our mosques, churches and homes. We will protect you," he said.
Our soldiers are told they can go home to their families, where they really want to be. The person on the tape sounds as if he has spent a lot of time in the US, because of his slight accent and clear diction.

Sound familiar to anyone? The insurgents don't really think that will sway any of our soldiers into laying down their arms, do they?

PsyOps works. We use it all the time. I think the difference is that, when we use it, we have the fire power to back it up. The enemy surrenders because they know that we speak the truth- lay down your arms, and you will be treated well (whether that is good or bad is an argument for another day). When the insurgents tell our soldiers that they'll be safe, our soldiers know better, because they have seen what the insurgents have done to their brothers-in-arms. In addition, our guys have seen the good that they have done in Iraq, the things that don't make it onto the six o'clock news here in the States. And, we can never forget, our military personnel are men and women of honor and courage. They'll not be swayed by words of dishonorable criminals.

Are they that desperate? They can't fight our military outright, so they have to try to corrupt it from within. Guess that means our guys are doing their jobs.

Let us know how that persuation thing works out for you, ok?

Teach Your Children Well...


... or they'll throw you over the fence and let the pit bulls maul you.
A Brazilian man arguing with his 88-year-old mother threw her into a neighbors' yard where two pit bulls mauled her to death, police said on Friday... Polidoro told police his mother had jumped over the wall on her own.
Riiiiight! An 88 year-old woman jumps a fence. Into a yard with pit bulls. On purpose.

Dang. I hate to know what this guy is like when he's really mad.



Get over it, Michael


A US District Court Judge rejected Michael Newdow's challenge to there being prayer at the Inauguration next Thursday.

I'm sure you all remember Mr. Newdow. In 2000, he filed an almost identical challenge to the prayer at President Bush's first inauguration. (BTW- he lost that one, too.) In 2002, he sued to have "under God" removed from the Pledge of Allegiance (he won that, then it got tossed by the SCOTUS. He's filed again, though.) Now he's at it again.

Look, Mike. No one is forcing you to accept their beliefs. You don't have to pray during that time. Stare into space. Twittle your thumbs. Count to 1000 by 3s. You will not be "injured" by having to sit through someone's "pointless rambling to a G-d who doesn't exist" (your opinion, Michael, not mine). (Well, you won't be injured unless you start smarting off during said ramblings. Then you will get your rump handed to you by 3 or 4 good ole boys visiting DC from the Bible Belt. Just sayin'...)

You need to just get over yourself. 99.9% of the atheists in this country think you're an idiot. They don't care if the President asks a minister to pray during the Inauguration. They understand that he's not trying to establish an official religion. They have other things to worry about.

You, my sad, sad friend, need a life.

(In a related story, the US attorney for this case was noted as saying that Newdow is a putz, and when Newdow's attorney objected, the judge responded, "well, he is!") ... (ok... I made that part up. But you know they were all thinking it.)

Thinking Creatively


Where do you think most creatively? 20% of Americans say they have their moments of inspiration in the car, followed by while at the office/school, then in bed, outdoors, and the list goes on.

I'll admit it. I'm one of those car thinkers. On long drives (up to Dallas, or to OKC, or even to STL) my mind wanders all over the place. I have completed several novels. I have solved many of the world's political and socio-economic crises. I have designed dream homes (meticulously decorated, of course). My concepts for flower gardens are award-worthy.
Unfortunately, I had no way to write any of it down, so the brilliance that was my masterpieces are scattered among the road grunge that litters I-35 and I-44.

But... if my mind is wandering, thinking creatively as I cruise on down the road, is everyone else doing the same thing? That's... scary.



The Secret of a Happy Life?


For some reason, I don't think this is what parents were expecting when their eighth graders told them they were having a speaker for "career day":
Management consultant William Fried told eighth-graders at Jane Lathrop Stanford Middle School on Tuesday that stripping and exotic dancing can pay $250,000 or more per year, depending on their bust size...

...The principal said Fried's comments to the class came after some of them asked him to expand on why he included "exotic dancing" on his list of 140 potential careers.Fried spent about a minute answering questions, defining strippers and exotic dancers synonymously. According to Jason Garcia, 14, he told students: "For every 2 inches up there, you should get another $50,000 on your salary."

Pardon my language, but Whiskey Tango Foxtrot was this idiot thinking, telling a bunch of thirteen and fourteen year old kids that?

The principal of the school said that Mr. Fried may not be back for next year's career day. MAY not be? MAY NOT BE?

We wonder why society is going to Hell in a handbasket. We wonder why kids have no respect for their elders. Maybe it's because the public school systems bring in dingbats like this to "educate" our children!!



Thursday, January 13, 2005

Pandering to the Media


Today President Bush spoke to the press after a briefing from Sec. of Defense Donald Rumsfeld. He told everyone how proud he is of our military and how much he supports the SecDef.

Did we not know that? It's not like he said anything new. But he had to stop and say "attaboy!". All because the press demanded that he say something. In the world of the 24 hour news channel, real news is hard to find. So they (the press) try to find (or make) more.

You have to think that while the president was blowing sunshine up their collective tuckuses, he was secretly wishing he could tell them to take a long walk off a short peer.

Who is their target audience?


The UN wants to educate the world on the importance of safe sex in an effort to curb the spread of HIV/AIDS. To this end, they've begun a series of tv ads, available in 41 languages (although they're only being shown in South Africa, Canada and the Netherlands right now).

But these aren't just any commercials. Oh, no! These are animated spots, starring talking condoms. Condoms named Shaft, Stretch, and Dick. Yeah. You read right. The producers of the spots say they are trying to stop the AIDS epidemic from spreading through the use of humor.

I'm sorry. I know they're trying to do a good thing, even if I disagree with the message (sorry, gang- condoms fail - the only safe sex is no sex). I just can't imagine people taking this seriously. They're going to listen to a talking cartoon condom? I really doubt it.

Diet, Meet Common Sense


New diet guidelines were released yesterday by the Dept. of Health and Human Services and the Agriculture Dept.

They had some shocking revelations concerning the maintainance of a healthy lifestyle. When I read it, it was as if the clouds parted and all was made clear to me for the first time. Why had no one thought of this before?

Their guidelines in a nutshell? Eat less, exercise more.

How much of our taxes went into that?

When in Doubt...


... go further Left. That's the advice from Taxachusetts Senator Teddy Kennedy. Some of his ideas to keep the DNC from becoming "Red Clones" include:
  • expanding Medicare to include all citizens
  • funding college educations for everyone who makes it into college
  • defeating Social Security reform
  • not yielding on any aspect of a woman's right to choose
He also called Iraq President Bush's "Viet Nam", accused the Republicans of promoting the "politics of fear", and refered to newly elected Illinois Senator Barak Obama as Osama...

Preach on, Teddy. Preach on. Your worn, tried and failed ideas are the best thing that could happen to the GOP.





Wednesday, January 12, 2005

Grandma Must Be So Proud


Prince Harry proves that stupidity is genetic.



All that education... all that edequitte training... and he does that? Glad to know he isn't next in line for the throne behind Chuckles.



It's just a little bug...


Growing up, we had a problem with ants at our house. They were the little sugar ants- never hurt anyone, just not the most sanitary of God's creation. So, Dad would set out little pieces of cardboard on the countertops with this gooey stufff (Terro, if you're interested) and the ants would go away. And, I remember that I was always told to stay away from the red ants, because they would bite.

Fast forward to 7 years ago. We move to Central Texas. There were these funny little mounds in the backyard, and, when you poke them with a stick, hundreds of little ants swarm out of them. Those were fire ants- evil little buggers. Or so I was told.

Over the last few years, we've had quite a few ant mounds that we have had to dump insecticide onto and around. We'd had to take T2 to the doctor because of a soft-tissue infection from one of their bites, and he is also sensitive (but not allergic) to the bite. Hubby has had bites up his arm because he was in the wrong place at the wrong time. I've had a bite or two, but nothing too terrible.

Then the little monsters went one step too far. They got into the house. Not just into the house, but into our bathroom. And not just into the bathroom, but INTO MY BATHTUB. I'm taking a shower, minding my own business, when there is this pain in my foot, like someone stuck me with a white hot needle. I look down, and there's an ant, latched onto my foot.

That's it. I've had enough. I informed Hubby that SOMETHING had to be done. And he did something. We had been told that the only way to get rid of fire ants in the yard is to make your yard more toxic than your neighbors. So, our yard is now a toxic waste dump. And that's a good thing. I just feel sorry for all the people who live around us.

Tuesday, January 11, 2005

A Couple of Snapshots


OK. So they aren't exactly snapshots. Well, here... just take a look and tell me what you think they are:

Give up? Well, clicking on either photo will take you to the news articles, but... those are two photos of what is probably a planet. That isn't is our solar system. What's the big deal? If confirmed, these will be the first images ever taken of an exoplanet. And that is a very big deal.
"This is the first image of a planet outside our solar system," said UCLA astronomer Eric Becklin, quickly correcting himself to say it was an image most likely to be of an extrasolar planet. "So we really need to be sure."

Becklin and others eagerly await the April observations.

If confirmed, the finding would have "enormous impact" on the ability of astronomers to get funding for future telescopes that would look for Earth-like planets, said Steve Maran, press officer of the American Astronomical Society.
Yeah, I know. Big whoop. Well, it is a big whoop for those of us who used to dream of being an astronaut when we grew up, or wrote poetry about nebula, or looked forward to discovering the secrets of black holes and dwarf stars, or just really really had a crush on Starbuck. (What? That was just me? Oh... never mind...)

In other space news, they still haven't decided if Pluto gets demoted or a bunch of KBO get promoted, NASA's running into things on purpose these days, and scientists are fascinated by blobs. You read correctly. Gigantic Galactic Blobs.

Iraqi Police Dog Update


The Other Beth has an update on the Iraqi Police Dog story. Evidently, Hill's Pet Nutrition has come through in a big way, and they will be providing food for the police dogs on an ongoing basis.

I'm not usually a big fan of boycotts (they don't usually work), but I am a big fan of supporting companies who contribute to the community in positive ways and/or donate to worthy causes. Yeah, Hill's Science Diet costs a little more, but it's good food for your pets, and they're obviously good people.

What Will They Think of Next?


Keeping with their trend of increasing irrelevance, several groups are planning anti-Bush boycotts for January 20th.
David Livingstone says the idea behind the economic boycott he's organizing is simple: If people don't show up at work or buy things, companies lose money. As he sees it, that's money the Bush administration can't tax, and can't use to run the war in Iraq, protect polluters or chip away at the Constitution.

So the Detroit Democrat and a handful of other anti-Bush groups across the country are urging others of like mind to withhold their cash and labor on Inauguration Day - from all businesses. They don't think they'll inflict a huge economic pain, but they do want to make a point.

"I view the inauguration of Bush as a black Thursday for this country," Livingstone says. "We've tried marching in the streets to stop the war, we tried writing letters, we tried initiatives on the Web, but Bush doesn't listen. It seems to us the only thing Bush and the Republicans will listen to is money."
No, it's not that President Bush doesn't listen. It's not even that he doesn't care. It's that you're wrong.

And, that whole "Republicans only listen to money" thing? If you were to believe your own propaganda, the GOP has all the money anyway, so how will your paltry boycott influence anything, anyway? No one will even notice.
...Gordon doesn't expect to shake the economy, but does want to see the president recognize dissent.

"I think Bush should acknowledge the boycott. If we're effective, he'll know about it, and he should acknowledge it," Gordon says.
That's a big "IF", Mr. Gordon. But, you go right ahead and have your brown bag lunch, complete with tofu sandwich and vanilla soy milk. Oh, wait... you have to buy that at some point, don't you? Hmm.... kind of defeats the purpose of a boycott if you just buy it at another time, doesn't it?

One other planned "protest" during the Innauguration on January 20th is a jazz style funeral procession through downtown New Orleans, called The Jazz Funeral for Democracy. (No, I'm not linking to any of these groups. The link above has them, or google it. I'm not going to give these guys any traffic if I can help it.) They'll be mourning, well... I'm sure you can figure it out. From their mission statement:
The Jazz Funeral for Democracy is a coalition of concerned individuals and groups that oppose the war in Iraq as unconstitutional and undemocratic. Additionally, the coalition aims to raise public awareness of other dangerous national policies designed to curtail civil rights, narrow the interpretation of the U.S. Constitution and Bill of Rights, widen the divide between the wealthy and the poor, deny equal educational opportunities and health services to millions of Americans, ignore crucial environmental indicators for change, and promote discriminatory practices regarding gender, race, ethnicity, worship, and sexual orientation.
I almost feel sorry for all these people. There is no joy, no hope, no peace of mind. Their entire existence seems to revolve around various forms of oppression.

Unlike these poor, pathetic souls, I will be celebrating our Republic on January 20th. I will raise my glass high and give a toast to four more years of economic growth and prosperity, increased security at home and abroad, the return of traditional values, and the greatness that is our Nation.

And, I'm going shopping. Just seems like the thing to do.




Just a Question...


Amber Frey has been making the rounds to all the tv shows, promoting her new book, Witness. And, evidently, she won't do an interview without her attorney, Gloria Allred, sitting right next to her. In fact, she turned down an interview on The View because they wanted her to go on without Ms. Allred.

Is it just me, or does that just seem... weird?

Monday, January 10, 2005

Losing Their Place in the World... Finally


The Unabrewer thought I might be interested in this. He was right.

Feminists Face Tough Times After Election By DAVID CRARY, AP National Writer

NEW YORK - America's feminist leaders and their critics agree on at least one current political fact: These are daunting times for the women's movement as it braces for another term of an administration it desperately wanted to topple.

"The next four years are going to be tough, so we must be tougher," National Organization for Women (news - web sites) president Kim Gandy recently told supporters. "Our health, our rights, and our democracy are teetering on the brink."
Our health? The Bush administration wants to what- kill us? Our rights? Oooohhhh... you mean the right to suck your little "accident" into a sink. Our democracy? Dang, you girls drank a whole bunch of the KoolAid™, didn't you?
NOW, the Feminist Majority Foundation and numerous like-minded groups campaigned zealously against President Bush (news - web sites), contending that his economic agenda would inflict disproportionate harm on women and that his potential judicial appointments could jeopardize abortion rights.

To the feminists' dismay, Bush not only won — but he sharply reduced the Democrats' "gender gap" edge among women voters. Republicans also increased their majorities in Congress; new GOP senators include several staunch foes of abortion...
Hmmm... wonder if that's because women around the nation are finally waking up to the fact that NOW and other "like minded" groups do not represent the average American woman or her interests. About time!
..."The issue isn't whether they're mean-spirited or anti-women," Greenberger said. "What I do see is an administration with policies that are fundamentally out of touch with what women really need. ... They have other priorities that consistently outweigh and trump the everyday concerns that women have."
Let's see... what's my everyday concerns? Certainly not 99.9% of the things that NOW seems to think I'm worried about.
Referring collectively to conservative Republican leaders, Gandy said: "They like women just fine — as long as we know our place, which is preferably under a man's protection.

"Their primary allegiance is to corporations and the wealthy," she said. "Giving tax breaks to them means the economic burden falls more on women."
What decade are these women living in, anyway? Have they not looked out the window and looked at modern America lately?
Bush, of course, can make a strong case that he respects women — his new Cabinet will likely have four, including Condoleezza Rice (news - web sites) as secretary of state, and women for years have been among his closest political and legal advisers.

Beyond Washington, meanwhile, women are making impressive professional gains — as big-city police chiefs and university presidents, for example. They now comprise roughly half the enrollment in U.S. medical schools. And though a wage gap persists, woman now earn 80 percent of what men do, compared to 62 percent in 1980.

"Feminist leaders have failed to keep up with the times," said Christina Hoff Sommers, a resident scholar with the American Enterprise Institute, whose writings are often critical of groups like NOW...
OK... I've been saying that since... the early 80s. Yeah, I know. I was an early teen in the early 80s. So? I debated against the ERA in my freshman Social Studies class (this was right after time ran out on ratification). My argument- why pass more more laws? Just enforce the ones on the books! (The same argument can be made for a lot of issues, but I digress).
...Gandy, a NOW activist since 1973, is amused by suggestions that the women's movement is moribund.

"They've been writing headlines about the death of the feminism since the '70s," she said in an interview. "It's a lot of wishful thinking on their part."
Well, she is right, you know. I do wish feminism would just go away. 40 years ago... 30, even, feminism served its purpose. But their time is over. The women of the United States just don't need them anymore.
Among the movement's biggest worries are that Bush might appoint federal judges who favor outlawing abortion, that family-planning programs will lose crucial funding, and that the president's proposed changes to Social Security (news - web sites) would harm many widows and low-income women.
So... they threw in the whole Social Security issue just to make them appear to not be obsessed with abortion. Won't work, though... we know better.
"Social security privatization is a bad deal for women," said Lisa Maatz, public policy director for the American Association of University Women. "It's not just a retirement program, it's a family insurance program that protects a lot of women who earn less then men throughout their lifetime and are less likely to have a pension of their own."
Here. I'll type it slowly. Maybe you will understand. Social. Security. Is. Not. A. Retirement. Program. It. Was. Never. Meant. For. That. Johnson. Screwed. It. Up. And. Made. Everyone. Think. It. Was. Something.That. It. Was. Not. Designed. To. Be. Got it? Good. Let's continue.
Maatz and her colleagues at AAUW also feel the government should do more to help low-income women gain access to colleges and vocational schools, and to crack down on sexual harassment throughout the educational system.
Once again, we don't need MORE government. There are plenty of programs already to get low-income women into college and vocational schools. And there are a lot of low-income women who have grown up in a world where sure, Uncle Sam will give you scholarships and grants to go to school, but he'll also pay you to have kids and sit on your rump all day. Hmmm... work hard or hardly work? Tough call.

Don't start with how I'm stereotyping the poor. I know there are people (young men and women) who want nothing more than to work their way up from where they started and give their families a better life. But I also know that I grew up close to one of the worst examples of welfare gone bad. I've seen both sides. I just think that government has done enough, thankyouverymuch.

And, as for the whole "sexual harassment" thing... some women are too quick to be offended. But, if there is actual harassment going on, there are already mechanisms in place to deal with it within academia. Once again, government should just stay out.
Looking ahead, feminists say one of their most crucial tasks is drawing more women into politics. Though the number of women in Congress increased slightly in the Nov. 2 election, the number of female state legislators has been stagnant for six years at about 22 percent of the total.

"We're looking for candidates now for 2006, for 2008," said Llenda Jackson-Leslie of the National Women's Political Caucus, which tries to encourage progressive women to run for office.
I think she's going to be sorely disappointed. You may get "progressive" women to run and maybe even win in the Blue Counties (not even going to call them "Blue States"). But, in the Red States, there are women running, and winning, races. And they're not the kind of women these groups want in office. They're stong, conservative women.
Despite conservatives' success in the election, feminists found some encouragement — notably an increased turnout by low-income women in many areas, and the overwhelming re-election in populous California of Sen. Barbara Boxer (news, bio, voting record), an outspoken women's rights advocate.
Yeah, well, that was a given in Left Leaning California, but, honestly, last week, she lost a lot of credibility with the rest of the Nation. They may love her in California, but they're the only ones.
"We have to hang tight," said Eleanor Smeal, president of the Feminist Majority Foundation. "This is going to be a tough time for us, but in the long run we have many things going in our direction. One important thing we've got — people know they want more opportunities for their daughters."
Feminists do not represent the majority of women. They erroneously presume that they do. But they've never asked what we think. I don't think they really want to know.

If they asked, they'd find out that people want their children to have the opportunity to succeed, no matter their gender. Most have us have accepted equality among the sexes as a fact.

Too bad the Feminists are living in the wrong century.


Saturday, January 08, 2005

To Boldly Go...


Vincent G. Cerf has a plan. A bold plan. "Who is Vincent G. Cerf?" you ask. You don't know? He's the guy who designed. ARPANET. "What in the world is that?" you ask. Well... it's what laid the groundwork that made it possible for you to read this post. In a nutshell, Mr. Cerf, not Al Gore, invented the Internet.

Back to his plan. In the same way that his vision connected all corners of our globe, he wants to connect all the planets in the solar system.
The new Internet across the solar system would help scientists understand other planets and would also help astronauts in their communications with earth..."Even light takes six minutes from Earth to Mars, and the farthest planets are 40 minutes apart. So our protocol had to be faster than light," he said, adding that it took him five years to design the new one.
I find this interesting, if for no other reason than "Faster Than Light Physics" has been routinely condmemned as science fiction hogwash. (I was interested in physics for a while... relativity intrigues me...) Granted, there is facinating research being done on the possibility of superluminal particles (tachyons), but it's not realistic in real world, practical situations anytime in the near future.
Mars should be connected by 2009 and Jupiter by 2012, Cerf told IANS on the sidelines of the 92nd Indian Science Congress here.

The development comes in the wake of US plans to send a man to Mars some time after 2020.
You know, I'm all in favor of advances in science and technology. And this sounds like a great plan, if he can get past that whole causality problem (Einstein's theory of special relativity, etc). I only have one question .

If we're not sending anyone to Mars until 2020, who's he planning on IMing on Mars in the mean time?



Valid comparison?


In Germany, a Catholic Cardinal is under fire because of comments he made comparing abortion to the Holocaust.
During a sermon in the city's cathedral on Thursday, the cardinal declared: "First there was Herod, who ordered the children of Bethlehem to be killed, then there was Hitler and Stalin among others, and today unborn children are being killed in their millions."
Instead of one burst of hatred and evil, abortion continues on a on, more of trickle than a downpour of death.
The co-president of the Greens Party is demanding an apology, and the head of the Central Council for Jews in Germany is contemplating going to court (huh? -ed.) An ecumenical movement, Initiative Kirche also voiced outrage.

OK, I'm not Jewish. I may never fully understand the depth of the emotions surrounding this. But I have stood in the concentration camp in Dachau - you can still feel the evil in that place. And, the paranoid murder of Jewish children by Herod was its own form of evil.

The difference between those two acts (Herod's murderous rampage which killed thousands of young children and the Holocaust which killed approximately 6 million) and abortion that I can think of is that while the first two acts were blatant and on a huge scale, abortion is more of a trickle than a downpour of evil.

I seriously doubt that the good Cardinal had any intention of belittling the horror of the Holocaust. To think otherwise is to simply choose to believe the worst about a person. Unlike anti-Semites who would have us believe that the Holocaust never happened, this man of God is trying to highlight another horror against humanity, not tear down the memory of those who were lost in an earlier horror. One was an unmitigated act of evil and brutality. The other is an act of brutality, but the evil lies in selfishness, not psychotic rage and mass hysteria.

There is one other comparison between the Holocaust and abortion that the Cardinal failed to mention. Hitler and his ilk justified their killing spree in many ways, one being that Jews were less than human. And what do "pro-choice" activists say about the aborted babies? They're not really not alive, just a mass of tissue. Not really human yet.

Sound familiar?

RIP, Rosemary Kennedy


Rosemary Kennedy, sister of Senator Teddy Kennedy, passed away Friday. She was 86 years old.

Rosemary was born mentally retarded back in a time when birth defects like that were shushed up, hidden from public view if all possible. When she was 23, well-meaning doctors suggested to the Kennedy family that it would be best for her if they lobotomized her. Her father consented to the procedure.

Her sister, Eunice, inspired by Rosemary, founded the Special Olympics to encourage mentally challenged children and adults to strive for greatness and not hide.

A parent who no longer feels embarassed or ashamed of their child's disability, the smile on a child's face as they cross the finish line or score a basket or hit a baseball at one of the Special Olympics meets- that is the rich legacy of Rosemary Kennedy.

Rest in peace, Rosie.

Stingy, eh?


An AP poll has found that three in ten Americans have donated to tsunami relief.
The total of private donation is rapidly approaching the $350 million pledged by the government as private citizens made many of their donations online.

By Friday afternoon, relief charities had raised more than $324 million in cash pledges, according to the Chronicle of Philanthropy - up from $245 million as of Wednesday. Some of that money has been donated by companies and foundations.
So much for the US being stingy. One financial analyst I heard on tv this morning that although Australia has pledged somewhere along the lines of $700 million over several years, the US contributions (gov't and private donations) will probably top $1 billion. And that's not including corporate funds used to rebuild/improve industry in the area.

On a somewhat related note (sorry, no link- I heard it on FoxNews yesterday). Greg Palkot was reporting from one of the area most affected by the tsunami, and he mentioned that yesterday (Friday) was the first Friday the Muslims have been able to have Friday prayers at the mosque. He heard the word "American" over and over. Considering that when that word is spoken during Friday prayer, it's usually in a less than flattering manner, he asked what was being said. Quite to his surprise, he was told that the imam was praising the American effort to help the community and said (a paraphrase) for every the Americans do for us, it must be repaid one thousand fold.

Hmm... at least someone likes us. Bask in this warm fuzzy moment. You know it won't last.



Thursday, January 06, 2005

Almost Speechless


This (found at LGF) has almost left me speechless. Fortunately for you, I said almost.
Visiting with U.S. troops in Baghdad on Thursday, failed presidential candidate John Kerry trashed Commander-in-chief George Bush for making "horrendous judgments" and "unbelievable blunders" that have undermined the war effort.

In a series of demoralizing comments first reported by the San Francisco Chronicle, the defeated Democrat griped, "What is sad about what's happening here now is that so much of it is a process of catching up from the enormous miscalculations and wrong judgments made in the beginning."...

...Then, perhaps sensing he'd gone too far, the 2008 White House hopeful cut short the Bush-bashing, saying, "Now, it's a different time and different set of judgments that have to be made. I'm here to make judgments about what moves are available to us."
How dare this man go over there and tear down the Commander-in-Chief! What was his goal? He's no longer running for office - HE LOST. The only thing I can think of is that he's continuing what he started during the Viet Nam war- tearing down our troops for his own personal gain.

Where does the First Amendment stop and sedition start?




"Tolerance"- such a beautiful word


On March 11, a new video will be distributed to thousands of schools around our country.
Arthur, Barney, Bear, Big Bird, Clifford, JoJo and SpongeBob, as well as over 100 other beloved children's characters, have united to re-record the smash hit "We Are Family" in an unprecedented music video to promote tolerance and diversity to America's children. The video, which demonstrates to children the importance of togetherness embodied in the word “family”, will be distributed to 61,000 public and private elementary schools in the United States on March 11, 2005, in celebration of the proposed National We Are Family Day. (taken from the We Are Family Foundation web site.)
They will also have lesson plans available. Sounds all goodness and light, right? Well... not really. The video and the lesson plans direct children to the foundation's website, encouraging them to take a tolerance pledge.
Tolerance is a personal decision that comes from a belief that every person is a treasure. I believe that America's diversity is its strength. I also recognize that ignorance, insensitivity and bigotry can turn that diversity into a source of prejudice and discrimination.

To help keep diversity a wellspring of strength and make America a better place for all, I pledge to have respect for people whose abilities, beliefs, culture, race, sexual identity or other characteristics are different from my own.
OK... how do I say this without sounding like a narrow-minded heartless jerk? I'll take it phrase by phrase, I guess. Honestly, I have no problem with the first paragraph. And I have no problem with large portions of the second paragraph. Respecting those of differing abilities, beliefs and races is just common sense. But, I do have trouble with people who are here who refuse to respect our culture- there's nothing wrong with retaining a sense of where you came from. But to reject your adopted nation's culture all together makes me wonder why you came here in the first place.

And, ah, yes... sexual identity. Let's teach the little kids that two mommies or two daddies is exactly the same as a mom and a dad. My belief system, which people are supposed to respect, according to this pledge, prohibits me from recognizing homosexual behavior as equal to heterosexual behavior. One is a sin, the other is not (when in a marriage). I can choose not to preach at you if you make the choice to lead a homosexual lifestyle (and, no, I'm going down that road on whether or not it's just "who you are" or if it's a choice.) But I do not have to respect that choice.

No, I do not want my children to be intolerant thugs who harass those who are different from them at every turn. I want them to understand that there are people who are not the same as they are, and that those people could very well be good friends if you give them a chance. I do want them to celebrate the diversity that makes our nation so unique in this world. But I do not want them to become desensitized to things that go against the belief system they have embraced. As they mature, they will come to understand that people were given free will, and they can make poor choices as well as wise choices. And that this does not mean that they have to accept those choices as "just the way it is."

Helping the Iraqi Police K-9s


The Iraqi police need some help. More precisely, their dogs need some help.
The commander of an Army Reserve detachment is begging friends back home to send food for Iraqi police dogs.

"The dogs are starving and urgently need dry dog food," Capt. Gabriella Cook, commander of the Las Vegas-based 313th Military Police Detachment, said in a Dec. 28 e-mail reported Wednesday by the Las Vegas Review-Journal.

"Some of them have already died," Cook wrote. "Half of them are sick. We have no way of buying actual dog food here."
We need to remember something. Although this was a secular "Islamic" country, there are a lot of faithful Muslims living in Iraq. And, for some reason that I've never understood, Mohammed was not a big fan of Man's Best Friend. They are not allowed to have dogs as pets, so of course there would be no dog food available at the markets. There is literally no way to buy dog food there.
"PetSmart has donated a pallet of food, and we hope PetCo will do the same," Judith Ruiz, president of the Las Vegas Valley Humane Society said.

Ruiz said several companies have donated food and that with the money, the Humane Society will be able to buy more dog food at a discounted rate and will also pay for shipping to Iraq.

"All funds will go directly for the animals," Ruiz said.

The Humane Society is a nonprofit, all-volunteer organization. So your donation will be tax deductible.

Send donations to:

Las Vegas Valley Humane Society
Funds For Dogs In Iraq
2250 E. Tropicana
Suite 19
Las Vegas, NV 89119

Make checks payable to the Las Vegas Valley Humane Society. The group asks that you indicate in a letter or on the check that you want your donation to go to the dogs in Iraq.
I know that there is a big push for contributions to tsunami relief, and I know that money is pretty tight after the Holidays. I know there seems to be a hand out every where you turn, asking for just a little something to help this cause or that. But, as the Stewards we were made by our Creator, it seems important, if you have some extra money, to help out here.





Why Did He Even Bother Coming Back?


Many of us remember the story of the US Marine who claimed he had been lured away from his base in Iraq, kidnapped, etc. Ended up he faked the whole thing, and he was located in Lebanon.

So, he came back to the States to face charges. On Dec. 9, he was officially charged with desertion. And he was supposed to report back to the base on the 4th of January from holiday leave.

Guess what! He didn't show up! Go figure! ATM records have traced him through Toronto back to Lebanon.

First, he took Christmas leave. The guy is a Muslim. They don't celebrate Christmas. It would have made more sense for him to ask for leave over Ramadan or some other Muslim Holy Day. I would have been watching him just because of that.

Next, his American passport was found in Iraq, but not his Lebanese passport. Why was that not flagged? (Although, looking at a calendar, he could have driven to Toronto, then hopped a plane to Lebanon.) Or, better yet, why was it not confiscated?

Finally, why did he come back to the US to begin with? I mean, his wife's visa was due to expire, so she was on her way back to Lebanon, anyway. Why not stay with his (supposedly rich and influential) family in Beruit? This smells fishier than a poorly ventilated fish market.

The Letter Project


You'll notice that I've put a new button on my sidebar. It's for The Letter Project. Slagle has decided to carry on the project he started to send letters to our military personnel overseas to let them know that there are plenty of folks back home who support them. Take a moment, visit Slagle's site, and write them a note.

Overturned!


Andrea Yates' murder conviction has been overturned by an appeals court. They have ordered a new trial.
In December, her attorneys told a three-judge panel of the appeals court that she deserves a new trial because of 19 errors that were committed in her 2002 trial.
This included a "whopper of a falsehood" by one of the prosecution's witnesses.

She will probably not go free while they prepare for a new trial. She is a sick, sick woman who did a horrific thing. No, I'm not saying that I think she is not responsible for her actions. I just think she's a very sick woman.

Make sure all the i's are dotted and the t's crossed. Then let justice be served.

A Little More Face Time


This morning, I saw an interview with a US Senator (doesn't matter which one- they're probably all going to end up doing the same thing, so...) He's planning a trip to some of the areas more severely effected by the tsunami in order to assess the situation and decide what needs to be done.

He has to travel there to get that information? He will take people away from their jobs (from military transport staff who could be moving food and other supplies into the area to the people who will have to show him around and wait on him.) He'll get in the way. He won't be there to help- he'll be there for the photo op, to show his people back home that he's important, that he's doing something. It's the same as the head of the IRC and other relief organization going out in their dress slacks and shirts, passing out a couple of bundles of food for the photo op. This isn't part of their job- they're just out "in the field" because it looks good.

I understand why Sec. Powell and Gov. Bush are there- they are officially representing the US Government. They have experience dealing with disasters and diplomacy. They are there because they need to reassure the governments that the US will be there for them, that we will help them get through this.

Senators and Representatives should do what they were elected to do (and that wasn't trapsing all over the world). This senator can get all the information he needs on what needs there are in the area from the people who are in the know, who are there, working. He and the rest of our elected officials, unless sent by the President, should stop wasting our tax payer money to make themselves look special.

The Party of Irrelevance


Fox News ia reporting this morning that Senator Barbara Boxer (D. Cal) is going to formally protest the Ohio election results. Several Representatives (Conyers (D-MI) and Jackson (D- IL) to name two) have already stated that they will also protest the results.

What does this mean, technically? Congress will be meeting in a joint session today. Once this objection is raised, they will split into their separate Houses, and there will be up to 2 hours of debate. Nothing will come of it because there is no evidence of widespread voter fraud in Ohio or anywhere else (with the possible exception of Washington.) Then, once they have satisfied this last ditch effort to get 37 seconds of additional drama concerning this election, the results will be ratified.

What I find interesting is that John Kerry (D-Mass) isn't even going to protest the results. He's not even going to be in the country for the vote. Nice to know he's not changing his Senate voting habits now that he's not running for President anymore.

Wednesday, January 05, 2005

Familiar Places on TV


Today I had Fox News on in the background, and I thought I heard a familiar name. I grab the TiVo controls and hit rewind (ok... I'll admit it... I didn't think we needed the TiVo, and while we didn't need it, it's a lot more useful that an VCR, that's for sure). Sure enough, President Bush was in Collinsville, IL today.

Collinsville is pretty darn close to where I grew up. Close enough that one of my best friends from high school lived there. Close enough that I got the joke when the President said he wished Laura was there with him so they could go see The Catsup Bottle. That was just funny.

I'm not really going to get into the focus of his speech ( jury award limits on malpractice cases)- I argued the point enough with my dad. You either think that frivolous lawsuits need to be stopped, or you don't.

It was just cool to see President Bush so close to where I once called home.

That's who did it?


(just seen on Fox News- sorry, no link)

There is a lot of blaming going on due to the tsunami. Who is responsible for all that destruction? Islamic clerics say Christian holidays brought on God's wrath. Other religious leaders say that God was doing some population control. Others say that Mother Earth was retaliating for the way we have damaged the planet over the years.

Then there's the loonier conspiracy theories. The war in Iraq, with all the hundreds of thousands of tons of explosives detonated caused the earthquake that caused the tsunami. Or, better yet, the United States and Israel detonated an underwater nuke in the Indian Ocean, intentionally causing the tsunami. (You can go look these up on Democratic Underground. No, I'm not going to link them. I will not be responsible for the death of that many brain cells).

So, a reporter asked former President Bush (41) about these allegations. His response?

"We're blaming Elvis, personally. That's how we'd respond."

Too funny. And very very appropriate.

No, You Pompous Twit...


... you do NOT speak for the world.
In a transcript obtained by The Associated Press, he said: "Hi, I'm Richard Gere, and I'm speaking for the entire world. We're with you during this election time. It's really important: Get out and vote."
You know, if there were real choices, if there was a real chance that one of the candidates was willing to work for peace, then I'd agree with him.

But, that's beside the point. He doesn't speak for me, in the same way that NOW doesn't speak for me. How dare they make those presumptions!



Tuesday, January 04, 2005

We're Having Us a Party...


(with apologies to Shania Twain and Billy Currington)

We're having us a party
(I don't think I can come)
Uh,uh, this ain't just any kind of party
(Nah, I think I'll stay at home)
Uh, oh, no It's gonna be really, really hot
(Startin' to sound good)
We're gonna put you on the spot
(Hey, maybe I should)
Yeah, there'll be lots of fun and guns
(Guess I could be there)
Come on and join the fun
(What should I wear?)
I'll tell you that it..

BRIDGE:
It doesn't matter what you wear
'Cause it's only gonna be
the VRWC there (Whoa!)

CHORUS:
We're having a party
Lots and lots to do
Invitin' nobody
Nobody but you



That's right, boys and girls! It's time for the first (that we know of) official Texas Blogmeet™! It will be March 18-20th somewhere in Dallas. There will plenty of food, drink and fun! This weekend of fun and frivolity is open to any/all bloggers, LC of the VRWC and other like-minded, fun-loving people (trolls are invited, only if they promise to behave themselves and bring their own rope for the pinata). One does not need to a resident of the Great State of Texas in order to attend.

A little background. I was hanging out in the chatroom of the VRWC, and MamaMontezz was going on and on about how much fun she had at the Jawja blogmeet. I'll admit it- we were all quite jealous. So... Lord Spatula and I (and Denita and I can't remember who else) started conspiring planning our own bacchanal shindig. Thus Texas Blogfest 2005™ was born.

So, you're thinking "this is great! Where do I get more information?" Well, you click here or the button in my sidebar. Details are still a little sketchy (hey- we actually nailed down a date- does that count for nothing?) We will make announcements and provide more information on that site.

I'm not too proud to ask for help. If you have any ideas for activities or cool places to visit in the Dallas area, leave a comment or send us an e-mail. We have a few ideas up our sleeves, but I'm willing to entertain more suggestions!!!




Not a Light Blogging Alert


Sorry for the absence the last few days. Personally, I'm blaming Advil Sinus and Cold. When you're doing a fine job trying to earn some Nyquil (I got the coughing, achy, and stuffy head... never did quite get the fever... ), it's difficult to string words together in a conversation, much less type coherently. Last evening, I would have told you I'm on the mend. This morning... I'm not so sure.

Alas, I cannot put my life on hold because my nose would put Rudolf to shame. Nope. It's probably time to take down the Christmas decorations (traditionally, I've kept them up until Epipheny- I mean, you want it all festive when the Three Wise Men pay their respects, right?) And I need to straighten up the house (R's family is coming over to watch OU beat the snot out of USC). (update at 10:15am- I just canceled the festivities for tonight. I'm going to make myself some hot tea and crawl back into bed for a while. A week or so might be about right.- ed.)

So, if you have any sure-fire cold/allergy remedies, feel free to share. I need all the help I can get.

I have a couple of mini-posts on the back burner (need to find some links). And hopefully, if my partner-in-crime is paying attention, said p-i-c will take this as a not so subtle hint to do a little writing today. We have a fun announcement coming up, and I want to add a button to my sidebar!!!

Can you say party? I knew you could!

Saturday, January 01, 2005

Well... at least he wants to obey the law, right?


Last night, while watching the drunken revelry that is New Years in Times Square, I had this conversation with T2:

T2:"I can't wait until I turn 21."
Me:"uh... why?"
T2:" Then I can get drunk with my friends on New Years."

So, I should be happy that he wants to be a proper, law-abiding citizen and wait until it's legal to partake of adult beverages before he goes and gets smashed with his friends. Right?

OK... so I have 10 years to explain to my children that a slight buzz is actually more fun than an acloholic stupor. How in the world am I supposed to do that???

A Morbid Start to the New Year


This may make some of you say, "Ew!" and that's ok. So did I when I first saw it. But, I kept coming back. It's a unique way to follow the news. And maybe get prizes.

What am I talking about? I'm talking about The Dead Pool. In a nutshell, you turn in a roster of 15 famous (or infamous) people who you think will pass away during the coming year. Like I said, "ew." Pretty morbid, right?

Well, I turned in my roster. Yeah, I did it. And you know what, I hope I lose- big time. I mean, I don't want any of these people to die (with 2 possible exceptions- but, no, not really.) So, why did I do it? Well, it seemed like the thing to do at the time. And, honestly, as I was thinking about the coming year, looking back at the year gone by, the reality of life and death got to me. It was almost theraputic to work up the roster. Weird, eh?

So, here's my roster (with explanations):
1. George W. Bush (43) (I think someone might try to take him out, but I hope I'm wrong)
2. George H.W. Bush (41) (he's getting older now, and... well... )
3. Jimmy Carter (president #39) (he's old)
4. Saddam Hussein (former dictator)
(he's got a lot of people who would like to enact their own justice on him)
5. Charleton Heston (Moses) (he's old)
6. Pope John Paul II (he's old)
7. Billy Graham (he's old)
8. William Renquist (chief justice, USSC) (he's old and sick)
9. Gerald Ford (he's old)
10. Fidel Castro (he's old)
11. Rosa Parks (she's old)
12. Kim Jung-Il (he's old)
13. Lindsey Lohan (dob July 2, 1986) (she's my "high point" pick- she's young, yes, but she's a wild child, and she was Hubby's idea, so...)
14. Andy Rooney
(he's old)
15. Dick Clark (he's getting old)

Did you notice something? Most of my pick are, well, "old." Not that they would be happy to hear that anyone thinks that about them. But, alas, it is true.

So... if you like dark humor, check out The Dead Pool. Laurence Simon keeps track of the roster picks in the news, and he provides some pretty good commentary on current events while he's at it. If you're not a fan of dark humor, read some BC. (Hey, I love BC! I read it every day!)

Happy New Year!!


Happy 2005!!!

I hope the coming year is everything you wish and nothing that you dread!

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?